Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, Academia Sinica ¡¼

¡U¤¤¥¡¬ã¨s°|¡U¤¤°ê¤å­õ¬ã¨s©Ò¡U¥»©Ò¦ì¸m¹Ï MAP ¡U©Ò¤º¤½§i¡U¤¤¤åª©¡UENGLISH¡U

¡@

¤¤°ê¤å­õ¬ã¨s¶°¥Z  ²Ä¤Q¤K´Á

¥Ø  ¿ý

³\ªF®ü

º~½á»P¤¤°ê¥j¨å»¡ªA ¢w¢w±q¡m°­¨¦¤l¡n¬Ý¥q°¨¬Û¦p¡B·¨¶¯½á¤¤ªº¯«¥P½×­z

¦ç­Yªâ

¼g¯u»P¼g·N¡G±q­ð§Ó¥_§ºÃDµe¸Öªºµo®i½×§º¤H¼f¬ü·NÃѪº§Î¦¨

¾d¥»´É

½×¨¯±ó¯eªº¤å¾Ç«ä·Q»P¼f¬ü±¡½ì

©P«Ø´ü

­«Åª¡q§ù¤Q®Q«ã¨I¦ÊÄ_½c¡r

¤ýÀõ¬Â

©ú¥½²Mªì¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@¤§¨¥±¡¤º²[¤Î¨ä©Ò¤Þ¥Í¤§¼f¬üºc«ä

¿½  ¹£

²î¤s¥H¡u¶Õ¡v½×¸Ö©M¤¤°ê¸ÖºqÃÀ³N¥»½è

Àd¤ô¥É

²_­°º[¹Iª@¢w¢w½×¡mÃèªá½t¡n©Ò±æ²×µêªº¤Ñ¸ô¾úµ{

©P¤j¿³

¤ý©Z¤§¡q¼o²ø½×¡rªº¤Ï²ø«ä·Q¡G±q¥È¾Ç»P¤Ï¥È¾Ç¡B²ø¾Ç»P¤Ï²ø¾Çªº¤¬°Ê½Í°_

¹ù©ú¬¡

ªkÂêººØ©ÊÆ[

³¯Þ³ªâ

¦Û§Úªº«ÈÅ餯»P´¶¹M¤Æ¢w¢wªñ¥N¤é¥»ªº¡uªF¬v¡v½×¤Î¨äÁô°Î¨ä¤¤ªº¡u¦è¬v¡v»P¡u¤ä¨º¡v

¤ý¤p¬Þ

¡m¶V«nº~¤å¤p»¡ÂO¥Z¡n©M»P¤§¬ÛÃöªº¤åÄm¾Ç°ÝÃD

 

Number 18          March 2001

Han Dynasty Fu and Classical Chinese Persuasion Reading Ssu-ma   Hsiang-ju¡¦s and Yang Hsiung¡¦s Fu Works about Immortals in Kuei-ku tzu

HSU Tung-hai

Verisimilitude and Abstraction: A Discussion of Sung Aesthetics According to the Development of Poetry on Painting From the T¡¦ang to the Sung Dynasty

I Lo-fen

A Reviw of Hsin Ch¡¦I-chi¡¦s Literary Theory and Aesthetics

GONG Bendong

A Re-reading of ¡§Tu the Tenth Sinks the Jewel Box in Anger

ZHOU Jianyu

The Expression of Ch¡¦ing and Its Aesthetic Construction in Late Ming to Early Ch¡¦ing Scholar-Beauty Drama

WANG Ayling

Wang Fu-chih¡¦s Definition of Poetry in Terms of ¡§Shih¡¨ and the Nature of Chinese Lyrical Poetry

XIAO Chi

The Hopeless Road to Heaven in Ching-hua Yuan

LO Shui-yu

Wang T¡¦an-chih¡¦s ¡§An Essay on Abolishing Chuang-tzu¡¨

CHOW Ta-Hsing

Fa-tsang¡¦s Interpretation of the Buddhist Idea of Gotra

LIU Ming-wood

The Objectivization and Universalization of the SelfA Critical look at the Japanese Touyou Discourse and the Ideas of Seiyou and Shina Implied Therein

CHEN Wei-fen

A Discussion of the ¡§Collected Vietnamese Novels Written in Chinese¡¨

WANG Xiaodun

 

º~½á»P¤¤°ê¥j¨å»¡ªA¢w¢w±q¡m°­¨¦¤l¡n

¬Ý¥q°¨¬Û¦p¡B´­¶¯½á¤¤ªº¯«¥P½×­z

³\  ªF  ®ü

´£  ­n

        Ãã½á¤å¾Ç¤§²£¥Í¡A»P¤¤°ê¥j¥NÁa¾î®a¨ã¦³±K¤ÁªºÃö«Y¡C¦Ó§@¬°Áa¾î¤§¾Ç¥D­n¥NªíµÛ­z¡m°­¨¦¤l¡n¡A¨ä¤¤¸Ô²Ó°O¸üµÛ¤¤°ê¥j¨å»¡ªAªººë´ï²z½×¡C¦]¦¹¡A±q¡m°­¨¦¤l¡n´£¥Xªº¦UºØ»¡ªA­ì«h±ø¥ó¤Î§Þ¥©¥[¥H¹ï·Ó¤ñ¸û¡AÀ³¦³§U©ó§Ú­Ì¤µ¤Ñ­«·s±´°Q¨Ã¦LÃÒº~½á»PÁa¾î¤§¾Çªº¨ãÅéÃö«Y¡C¯S§O¬OÃã½á¥»¬O·¥¬°­«µø»y¨¥ÃÀ³Nªº¤@ºØ¤åÅé¡A¤S»PÁa¾î¤§¾ÇÁ¿¨s¨¥µü»¡ªAªººë¯«¬Û»²¡C¦]¦¹¡A¥»½×¤å³z¹Lº~½áÂùÂz¡J¥q°¨¬Û¦p¡B´­¶¯ªº¡q¤j¤H½á¡r»P¡q¥Ì¬u½á¡r¬°¨Ò¡A¤À±q¡]¤@¡^»¡ªAªÌ¡B¡]¤G¡^±µ¨üªÌ¡B¡]¤T¡^¹Lµ{»P§Þ¥©¡B¡]¥|¡^»¡ªA°T®§®ÄªGµ¥¥|¤j¤è­±¡A¥[¥H±´°Q¡C

 

 

Han Dynasty Fu and Classical Chinese

Persuasion ― Reading Ssu-ma

Hsiang-ju¡¦s and Yang Hsiung¡¦s Fu Works

about Immortals in Kuei-ku tzu

HSU Tung-hai

      The production of fu, parallel prose, has close relations with ancient Chinese persuasion. An important and representative work of this trend is Kuei-ku tzu, a text that helps us to understand clearly the relationship between Han dynasty fu and Chinese classical persuasion.

      Basically prose poetry put emphasis on word-usage, and in this sense it resembles the classical Chinese conversation. The present paper uses Ssu-ma Hsiang-ju's and Yang Hsiung's fu poems, ¡§Ta-jen fu¡¨ and ¡§Kan-ch'uan fu¡¨, as illustrative examples, and analyzes its four main components: 1.Persuader; 2.Listener; 3.The Process and skill of persuasion; 4.Message and effect of persuasion.

 

Keywords: poetry in the Han dynasty    Kuei-ku tzu    persuasion

Ssu-ma Hsiang-ju    Yang Hsiung

 

 

 

¼g¯u»P¼g·N¡J±q­ð¦Ü¥_§ºÃDµe¸Öªºµo®i

½×§º¤H¼f¬ü·NÃѪº§Î¦¨

¦ç  ­Y  ªâ

´£  ­n

      ¡u¼g¯u¡v»P¡u¼g·N¡v¬O¤¤°ê¬ü¾Çªº¨â­Ó­«­n©RÃD¡Aµ§ªÌ¬ã¨s­ð§ºÃDµe¸Ö¡Aµo²{­ð¤H±j½Õ¡u¼g¯u¡v¡A§º¤H±À±R¡u¼g·N¡v¡A¡u¼g¯u¡v»P¡u¼g·N¡v«ê¥i¥H¥Nªí¡u­ð«¬¤å¤Æ¡v»P¡u§º«¬¤å¤Æ¡vªº¼f¬üºë¯«¡Aµ§ªÌ§Æ±æ±q®É¥N¼f¬üºë¯«¬°²z¸Ñ­ð§º¤å¤Æªº¤Á¤JÂI¡A¦]¦¹µÛ¤O©ó¤GªÌ¤§«ä·Q¤º²[¡CµM¦Ó¡A±ý½×ªR¡u¼g¯u¡v»P¡u¼g·N¡v¡A¤S¥²¶·Âç²M¥Ñ¡u­«¼g¯u¡v¨ì¡u©|¼g·N¡vªº¾ú¥v¯ßµ¸¡A©ó¬O¥HÃDµe¸Ö¬°¤å¥»¡A¨Ì¨äµo®i¤§¶iµ{¤À¬°¡u¥Hµe¬°¯u¡A·P¯«³qÆF¡v¡B¡uµ§ËƳy¤Æ¡A¤ß¥Í¸U¶H¡v¡B¡u§Î·N­Ñ¨¬¡A¥Í·N¯sµM¡v¡B¡u§Ñ§Î±o·N¡A·N¥~¤§½ì¡v¥|­Ó¤lÃD±´°Q¡C

      µ§ªÌ¥H¬°¡J¦w¥v¤§¶Ã¬O§áÂà¡u¥H¯uÃÙµe¡v¤§ÃDµe¸Ö®Ñ¼g¼Ò¦¡¡Aµ²§ôøµe¡u·P¯«³qÆF¡v±R«ôªº¤À¤ôÀ­¡AÃDµe¸Öªº§@ªÌ·NÃѨìøµe³Ð§@¹ïÀ³ªº¤£¶È¬O¼f¬ü«ÈÅé¡A­«¤ß¤£¦b¦p¦ó¨ã²{³æ¤@ªºª«¶H¡A¦Ó¬O³Ð¥Í¸Uª«ªº³y¤Æ¦ÛµM¡Aµe®a¥Hµ§¶Ç¹F³y¤Æ¤§¹êµM¡A¨äµ§¤Uªº¥@¬É¤S¬O¥Ñ¨ä¤ß·½¦Ó¨Ó¡A¬G¦Ó¥i¥HÀH¤â¥Íªá¡A¥Hµe¯d¬K¡C

      ¤¤±ß­ð¿³°_ªº¤ô¾¥µe¡A½ÄÀ»¤FÀ³ª«¶H§Îªº¦â±mÆ[©À¡A²£¥ÍµøÄ±¬ü·Pªº·s»ù­È¨ú¦V¡A³Ð§@¤ô¾¥µeªº¶h«~µe®aªº»Rµ§§Ë¾¥¡A¨Ï±o¤å¤Hª`·N¨ì¨ä­Ó¤H·N®ð»P³Ð§@¤§¡u¥ß·N¡v¡A¥iµø¬°§º¤H©|·N¤§¥ýÁn¡F±ß­ð¤­¥NªºÃDµe¸Ö³ò¶µÛ´M¨D·sªº¦]À³»P«~½à¤§¹Dªº¸ÜÃD¡A¨ä²z©À¤§§¹µ½«h¦³«Ý©ó§º¤Hªº¤å¤Æ¯À¾i¨Ó«Øºc¡C

       ¥_§º¤¯©v´Â¥ª¥k¡A¬Fªv¤Wªº­²·s±a°Ê¤F¤å¤Æ¤Wªº¶i®i¡A¦b¼f¬ü«ä·Q¤è­±¡A°£¤FÄ~Äò±ß­ðª¾¾åµe®a·N®ð¡BÅé¹î§@«~¥Î·NªºÅ²½à¤è¦¡¡AÁÙª`­«Æ[½àµe§@¤§¡u¥Í·N¡v¡A±N½Æ»s§Î¬Ûªº¡uÀÀ¯u¡v±a¤J¤F¡u¦X©ó¤Ñ³y¡v¡A½a¨s¥Í©R­n¸qªº¼h¦¸¡A¹L¥h¡u§Î¡v¡u¯«¡v¹ïÁ|ªº©RÃD¦b§º¥NÂର¡u§Î¡v¡u·N¡v¨Ã½×¡A¼Ú¶§­×¡u§Ñ§Î±o·N¡vªº¥D±i¡A¥H¤ÎĬ¸ý¡BĬÂá¡B¶À®x°íµ¥¤H´M¨D§@«~ªº·N¥~¤§½ì¡A¦@¦P¶}³Ð¤F±R©|¡u¿½±ø²Hªy¡v¡B¡u²»·²M·s¡vªº¼f¬ü·NÃÑ¡C

      µ§ªÌµo²{¡J±q­ð¤H¡u­«¼g¯u¡v¨ì§º¤H¡u©|¼g·N¡v¡A¨ä¹ê¬OøµeÃÀ³N³v¨B²æÂ÷¨äª«½è¯S©Ê¡A¦V¤å¾Ç«~Ų¾aÃl¡A¥ç§Y©ß«o¯ÂºéªY½àµøÄ±¬ü·P¡AÂà¦V¤H¤å«ä­P»Pµe¥~·N½ì¡A¥H¤å¾Ç¼g§@ªº ¡u·N¡v²ÎÄáøµe¼f¬üªº¹Lµ{¡C

 

 

Verisimilitude and Abstraction:

A Discussion of Sung aesthetics

according to the Development of Poetry

on Painting from the T¡¦ang to

the Sung Dynasty

I Lo-fen

      Verisimilitude and abstraction are two important concepts in Chinese aesthetics. In the course of the study of Sung and T'ang poetry on painting, the author discovered that T'ang writers emphasized verisimilitude while Sung ones praised abstraction. Thus these two categories can be seen as representative of the aesthetics spirit of the T'ang and the Sung dynasty respectively. But it is also important to understand the historical development that shifted the emphasis from verisimilitude to abstraction, and this is what the author sets out to do in this piece, by studying the development of poetry on painting. After presenting the historical background and the changes in aesthetic sense, the author concludes that the Sung move towards abstraction is a consequence of the departure from realistic depictions in painting towards more literary forms of representations. This more abstract type of representations would lead the observer to a literary concept and meaning to be found beyond the picture expressed in the painting.

 

Keywords: verisimilitude    abstraction    aesthetics

poetry on painting    T'ang    Sung

 

 

 

½×¨¯±ó¯eªº¤å¾Ç«ä·Q»P¼f¬ü±¡½ì

¾d  ¥»  ´É

´£  ­n

        ¨¯±ó¯e¨Ã¥¼µ¹«á¤H¯d¤Uª½±µ©M¨t²Î¦aªí­z¨ä¤å¾Ç«ä·Q©MÆ[©Àªº¤å¦r¡AµM¦Ó±q¥L¦b§@«~  ªº¤@¨Ç¹s¬Pªº½×­z¤Î¥Lªº³\¦h§@«~¥»¨­¡A§Ú­Ì«o¤£Ãø¬Ý¥X¥L¹ïµüÅ骺­«µø¡A¥H¤Î¥L¬O¦p¦ó§Q¥Î®É¤H¥Hµü¬°¤p¹D¡A¬G»P¸Ö¬Û¤ñ¡A§@µü¿©º×ªº·§²v¤]­n¤p±o¦hªºÆ[©À¡A¥Hµü¬°³³¼g¤§¨ã¨Ã¨ú±o°¶¤j¦¨´Nªº¡F¤£Ãø¬Ý¥X¥L¦b¥Hµü§ç¼g¯ÝÁr©M¤Ï¬MªÀ·|²{¹ê¡B´y¼±«ÈÆ[´ºª«®É©ÒÅé²{¥Xªº­Ý¿Ä­è¬Xªº¼f¬ü²z·Q©M±¡½ì¥H¤Î²Ó½oºø±KªºÃÀ³N³Ð§@¯S¼x¡A¦Ó³oºØ¼f¬ü±¡½ì»P¯S¼x¡A¬O»P¨ä«ä·Q¤Wªº¿Ä¦X§L¡B¾§©M©Ê®æ¤Wªº­Ý³Æ­è±jªG¼Ý»PÂÔÄY²Ó±K¦³µÛ±K¤ÁÁpôªº¡C

 

 

A Review of Hsin Ch¡¦i-chi¡¦s Literary

Theory and Aesthetics

GONG Bendong

      Hsin Ch'i-chi never wrote about his literary theories. However, by analyzing his literary works, we can notice how he devoted great attention to the formal aspect of tz'u. Furthermore, turning to his advantage the contemporary view that underestimated tz'u (thus the possibility of becoming unpopular through writing tz'u was less likely than when composing classical style poetry), he achieved great success with this form by pouring his out his heart. His unique aesthetics consisted in charming and meticulous artistry that mirrored real life and described scenery. His aesthetic approach is closely intertwined with his idea of merging the ancient military strategy with Confucianism, or, in other words, coupling hardness with softness.

 

Keywords: Hsin Ch'i-chi    literary theory    aesthetics

 

 

 

­«Åª¡q§ù¤Q®Q«ã¨H¦ÊÄ_½c¡r

©P  «Ø  ´ü

´£  ­n

      ¡u¥X°|¡v»P¡u¨H¦¿¡v¨â³¡¤Àªº¹ïÀ³ ­z¡Aºc¦¨¤F¥»§@«~¥~¦b§Î¦¡ªºµ²ºc¡F¤Q®Q»P§õ¥Ò¨â­Ó¨¤¦â¦bªÀ·|¦a¦ì»P¹D¼w¤ô·Ç¤Wªº¹ïÀ³Ãö«Y¡Aºc¦¨¤F§@«~¤º¦bªº²z¸ôµ²ºc¡C¾ã³¡§@«~±Ä¥Î³oºØ¹ïÀ³¦¡ªº±Ô­z¡A¦b´¦¥Ü¬G¨Æ¨¤¦â¤§¶¡ªÀ·|¦a¦ì¤§®t²§»P¹D¼w¤ô·Ç¤§®t²§ªº¦P®É¡A§ó±j½Õ¤F¨¤¦â¹D¼w¤ô·Ç¤§®t²§¡A±q¦Ó¦³®Ä¦a¹üÅã¤F§@«~ªº´J·N¡C¦ÊÄ_½c¨Ã«D¶È¬O¤@µ§ªþÄÝ©ó¤Q®Qªº°]²£¡A¥¦¥Hª«½è§ÎºA¤W²³©Ò¬Ãµøªº»ù­È¡AÁô³ë¤F¤Q®Q¡u¥þ¥É¦Ó·´¡v¤§¤H®æªº»ù­È¡C

      ¥»¬G¨Æªºµ²§½Áö¤£¦P©ó¡q¥É°ó¬K¸¨Ãø³{¤Ò¡r¡A¨âªÌªº¹w³]«e´£«o°ò¥»¬Û¦P¡C¥É°ó¬K¥Ñ©óÀ°§U¤ý¤T©x¦V¬ìÁ|¥K³~´_Âk¡A¨Ï¦Û¤vªº©R¹B±o¨ì¬@±Ï¡C§ù¤Q®Q¼£±v§õ¥Ò½ù¾Ç«nÂk¡A­IÂ÷¤F¬ìÁ|¥¿¹D¡A¦]¦Ó¾É­P¨â±Ñ­Ñ·l¡C«eªÌ³q¹L³]¸m¥É°ó¬K»P¤ý¤T©xªº¹Î¶êµ²§½¡A±q¥¿­±ªÖ©w¤F¤¤°ê¤å¤Hªº¶Ç²Î»ù­ÈÆ[¡F«áªÌ«h¦w±Æ¤Q®Q»P§õ¥Ò¥H´d¼@¦¬³õ¡A±q¤Ï­±±j¤Æ¤F¦P¤@»ù­ÈÆ[¡CµM¦Ó¡AµL½×¬O§ù¤Q®Q©Î¬O¥É°ó¬K¡A³£¦³«Ý©ó¨k¤H¥h¬@±Ï¡C¤Q®Q»P§õ¥Ò°ò©ó©Ê§O®t²§ªº±j®z¤§¤O¶q¹ï¤ñ¡A¬O¥Hªí¶H»P¹ê½è¹ï¥ßªº¤è¦¡Åé²{¥X¨Óªº¡Cªí­±ªº±j¶Õ­I«áÁô§tµÛ¹ê½èªº®z¶Õ¡A¤º¦bªºÀu¶Õ«h¥HÀ¶®zµL¯à¬°ªí¶H¡A¥Ñ¦¹¨Ï¨â­Ó¥D­n¨¤¦âªº§Î¶H³]­pÄ­²[¤F¤Ï¿Ø·N¨ý¡CµM¦Ó¤Q¤À­«­nªº¬O¡J¥L­Ìªº´d¼@µ²§½¥YÅã¤F¥H¨kÅv¬°¤¤¤ßªº¤å¤Æ·NÄ­¡C

 

 

A Re-reading of ¡§Tu the Tenth

Sinks the Jewel Box in Anger¡¨

ZHOU Jianyu

      The parallel narratives of the ¡§getting out of the brothel¡¨ and ¡§plunging into the river¡¨ form the external structure of this story, while the corresponding relations of the two main characters, with their different social and moral status, constitute its internal structure. The story, however, puts more emphasis on the differences in the characters' moral quality rather than their social class, thus revealing effectively the main theme of the story. The jewel box represents not only the wealth of Tu the Tenth, but also Tu the Tenth herself; as it refers to Tu the Tenth's will to die rather than to accept change.

      Although different in its conclusion, the story ¡§Yu-t'ang Ch'un in Misery Meets Her Lover,¡¨ shares a common assumption with ¡§Tu the Tenth¡¨. Yu-t'ang Ch'un rescues herself by helping Master Wang to return to the orthodox path of the civil service examinations.

      Tu the Tenth, however, destroys herself by taking Master Li away from the civil service examination. In other words, the happy ending of Yu-t'ang Ch'un and Master Wang's story confirms the traditional values of Chinese literati from a positive perspective, while the tragic ending of Tu the Tenth and Master Li strengthens the same value from a negative point of view. In any event, Tu the Tenth or Yu-t'ang Ch'un, as women, both have to be rescued by the male characters. The power-difference between Tu the Tenth and Master Li, based on their gender, is presented as a contrast between their appearance and essence. Master Li's apparent strength covers his real weakness and vice versa, and this makes the design of characters ironical. However, very importantly, the tragic ending of Tu the tenth evokes a culture centered on male chauvinism.

 

Keywords: Tu the Tenth    Common Words to Warn the World

Three Words    Feng Meng-lung    Yu-t'ang Ch'un

Chinese vernacular story

 

 

 

©ú¥½²Mªì¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@¤§¨¥±¡¤º²[

¤Î¨ä©Ò¤Þ¥Í¤§¼f¬üºc«ä

¤ý  Àõ  ¬Â

´£  ­n

        ¤¤°êÀ¸¦±µo®i¦Ü©ú¥½²Mªì¡A¥Ñ©ó©ö¥N¥@Åܤ§½ÄÀ»¡A°£¤F¶}©Ý¥X¡u¥H¦±¬°¥v¡vªº¼g¹ê·sÁÍ¥~¡A¨Æ¹ê¤W¡A¤´¦³¤£¤Ö¼@§@®a¤´©µÄòµÛ±ß©ú¥H¨Ó­«±¡«ä¼é¤§¾lªi¡A¥D±i¥H¯u±¡ªº§çµo¬°¬ü¡A±N¡u¨¥±¡¡v¡B¡u¼g±¡¡vµø¬°ÃÀ³N§e²{ªº®Ö¤ß¡A³Ð§@¥X³\¦h¥H¤~¤l¨Î¤H¹J¦X¡B±BÅʬ°ÃD§÷ªº·R±¡¨Î§@¡C©Ò¿×¡u¶Ç©_¤Q³¡¤E¬Û«ä¡v¡A¡u¬Û«ä¡v«üªº´N¬O¨k¤k¤§±¡¡C¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@¤§±¡¸`¦h¥b±Ô¼g¤~¤l¨Î¤H¤@¨£Á鱡¡B§uµú¹S°Ûªº±BÅʱ¡¨Æ¡F¤p¤H¼½¶Ã¡B¦n¨Æ¦h¿iªº±BÅʪȸ¯¡F¤Òºa©d¶Q¡Bº¡ªù¹Î¶êªº±BÅʵ²§½¡C­È±oª`·Nªº¬O¡A©ú¥N¡u¨¥±¡¡vÆ[ªºµo®i¡A±q§õðôªº¡uµ£¤ß¡v»¡§@¬°²z½×ªºµo°b¡A¸g¹L´öÅ㯪¡]1550-1616¡^¡B¶¾¹ÚÀs¡]1574-1646¡^µ¥¦bÀ¸¦±¡B¤p»¡¤è­±³Ð§@¹ê½î¤Wªº§V¤O¡A¨Ã´£·Ò¥X¡u±¡¦Ü¡v¡B¡u±¡¬°²z¤§ºû¡vµ¥¥D±¡ªº¬ü¾ÇÆ[ÂI«á¡A¦Ü©ú¥N¥½¦~¨ä²z½×¤ºÄ­µo¥Í¤FÅܤơC©ú¥½²MªìªºÀ¸¦±¼@½×®a¦p¤ý«ä¥ô¡]1574-1646¡^¡B©sºÙµÏ¡]¬ù1600-1684¡^¡B§õº®¡]1611-¬ù1679¡^»Pª÷¸t¹Äµ¥¤H¹ï¡u±¡¡vªº²z¸Ñ¡A§e²{¥X¤@ºØÂk´_©ó©Ê²zªº¶É¦V¡A§Yªñ©ó©Ò¿×¡u©Ê±¡ªÌ¡A§¸q¤§®Ú¬k¡vªº¡u±¡¥¿¡v¥ß³õ¡C¦¹ºØ¬ü¾Ç«ä¼é¤§ÂàÅÜ¡A¤]¥X²{¦b¹ê»Ú¼@§@¤¤¡C¤£¹L¥Ñ©ó¬ü¾Ç²z½×¤W¤§ÂàÅÜ»P³Ð§@¡A¨Ã«D¥²µM¦aµo¥Í©ó¦P¤@¶b½u¡A¦]¦¹¦b¦P¤@®É´Á¥i¥H¦³¥æ¿ùªºªí²{¡C¦p±ß©ú¦Ü²Mªì³\¦h·R±¡¼@ªº¨Î§@¡A¦b©Ê½è¤W¬OÄ~©Ó¤F´öÅ㯪ðݺq¡u¦Ü±¡¡vªº¶Ç²Î¡A¼@§@®a³q¹L¤~¤l¨Î¤H´dÅwÂ÷¦Xªº¬G¨Æ¡A²Ó½o¤J·L¦a´yø¤Fµo¥Í¦b¤Ö¨k¤Ö¤k¥Í©R¤¤±¡»P²zªº½Ä¬ð¡A´yø¥L­Ì¹ï·R±¡¥Í¦º¤£´üªº°õµÛ°l¨D¡A¨ÃÁ`¬O¥H±¡ªº¹ê²{»P±¡ªº¤£¦´¬°³Ì°ª¹Ò¬É¡A¦p¡mµI­»°O¡n¡B¡m¬õ±ö°O¡n¡B¡m¬õ±ù°O¡n¡B¡m¾ï®ú°O¡n¡B¡m±¡¶l°O¡n¡B¡m¹Úªá¶o¡n¡B¡mµe¤¤¤H¡n¡B¡m¦è¼Ó°O¡nµ¥¡CµM¦Ó¡A¤]¬O¦b±ß©ú¦Ü²Mªì³o¤@®É´Á¡AÀ¸¦±¼@§@¤¤ªº±BÅÊ¥DÃD¶}©l¥X²{¤F¥t¤@ºØ¾ú¥v©Êªº°fÂà¡C¦p¡m¼b¬õ°O¡n¡B¡m¿P¤lºà¡n¡B¡mºñ¨d¤¦¡n¡B¡m­s¤å°O¡n¡B¡m¤­°ª­·¡n¡B¡m¯³¼Ó¤ë¡n¡B¡m¥ÛÅïÃè¡n¡B¡m²Á¯Î¤QºØ¦±¡nµ¥§@«~¤¤¡A§@®a³£¤O¹Ï§â±¡»P§¡B±¡»P²z¡B±¡»P©Ê§é°J¦a·|²Î°_¨Ó¡AµÛ¤Oªí²{ªº¥u¬O·R±¡»PªÀ·|¨¸´c¶Õ¤O¡]¦pÅv»¨¶Õ­n¡BµL¦æ¤å¤H¡B¦l¶B¤p¤Hµ¥¡^ªº½Ä¬ð¡C±¡»P²zªº±j¯P¹ï¥ß»P½Ä¬ð¡A¦b³o¨Ç¶Ç©_¤¤¨Ã¥¼¤©¥H¥R¤À¦a®i¥Ü¡A¤Ï¦Ó¬O³vº¥®ø¿Ä©ó±¡²z¥æ¿Ä¡B±¡²z¦X¤@ªº½Õ©M½×½Õ¤§¤¤¡C

        ¦³Å²©ó¦¹¡A¥»¤å­º¥ý»¡©ú©ú¥½²Mªì¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@¡u±¡¡vÆ[ÂàÅܤ§¤åÃÀ«ä¼é­I´º¡F¨ä¦¸¡A±´°Q¦¹¤@®É´Á¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@¡u±¡¡vÆ[¤§©Ê²z¤ÆÁͦV¡A¨Ã¶i¤@¨B½×ªR¼vÅT©ú¥½²Mªì¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@±¡¸`³]­pªº´XºØ¼f¬ü¦Ò¶q¡F³Ì«á¡A«h½×­z¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@©Ò§e²{¤§§@®a¥DÅé·NÃÑ»P¤å¤H¤ßºA¡CÁ`¤§¡A©ú¥½²Mªì¤§¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@¤£°ß¦b¨ä¤º²[¤W¡A¨ã¦³¬YºØ¥i¥H²M·¡Å³§O¨ä¯S¼xªº«äºû¶É¦V¡A¥ç¥B¥Ñ©ó¦¹ºØ¶É¦V¡A³y¦¨¬Y¨Ç¥²µM±N¼vÅT¨äµ²ºc³]­p¤§¼f¬ü¦Ò¶q¡A¦Ó¦¹ºØ«äºû¶É¦V»P¼f¬ü¦Ò¶q¡A¹ê¥ç»P§@ªÌ¤§¥DÆ[»ù­È¤Î¨­¥@¤§·P¦³©ÒÃöÁp¡A­È±o½×ªÌ¯S¬°Ãöª`¡C¦Ó³o¨Çª`·NÂI¤]³£±N¦¨¬°¬ã¨s©ú²MÀ¸¦±¥v®É©Ò¤£±o¤£°Q½×¤§­n¶µ¡C

    ¡]¥»¤å©Ó¦æ¬F°|°ê®a¬ì¾Ç©e­û·|¸É§U¡A«Y§@ªÌ¡u©ú¥½²Mªì¤~¤l¨Î¤H¼@±¡Æ[¤§µo®i¤Î¨äÃÀ³N¯S½è¡v¡eNSC-89-2411-H-001-057¡f¬ã¨s­pµe¤§³¡¤À¦¨ªG¡AÂÔ¦¹­PÁ¡C¡^

 

 

The Expression of Ch'ing and Its Aesthetic

Construction in Late Ming to Early

Ch¡¦ing Scholar-Beauty Drama

WANG Ayling

      In the history of Chinese drama, the early Ch'ing period is usually regarded as equally important as the late Ming period for the development of chuanqi drama. In fact, chuanqi drama had been flourishing for almost two hundred years before the regional drama replaced it in the middle of the Ch'ien-lung period. Although the poetics of early Ch'ing drama continued the late Ming dramatic tradition, the transformation of dramatic aesthetics during the dynastic change must have influenced the writing of chuanqi drama. Following the shift from ch'ing to li, the dramatic aesthetics also moved from the late Ming yen-ch'ing ideal to the early Ch'ing idea of ¡§integrating ch'ing and li¡¨ (ch'ing-li-he-i). How did the rationale of ¡§integrating ch'ing and li¡¨ influence the development of love theme in the ts'ai-tzu chia-jen drama (scholar-beauty drama) of this period? How did the social and cultural background stimulate the flourish of scholar-beauty drama in late Ming? How did the change of the relation between ch'ing and li turn the late Ming romantic tradition into the early Ch'ing realm of realism with more historical and social consciousness? How did scholar-beauty drama produce its rational content and relevant aesthetic construction during this dynastic transition? What is the significance of writing scholar-beauty for the literati of this era? What are the major modes and structural characteristics of scholar-beauty drama? Did the authors present some special aesthetic taste in their plays? To answer these questions, I first examine how the social and cultural background influenced the development of scholar-beauty drama from the late Ming to the early Ch'ing. Secondly, I analyze the rational trends of ch'ing in these plays. I then go on to explore the narrative mode and the structural design of scholar-beauty drama. Finally, by discussing how Ming-Ch'ing literati externalized their subjectivity by writing scholar-beauty dramas and the mentality behind this phenomenon, I point out the significance of scholar-beauty drama from late Ming to early Ch'ing within the framework of Chinese literary tradition.

 

Keywords:  Ming-Ch'ing    late Ming    early Ch'ing    chuanqi drama

love    romantic    romance

 

 

 

²î¤s¥H¡u¶Õ¡v½×¸Ö©M¤¤°ê¸ÖºqÃÀ³N¥»½è

¿½      ¹£

´£  ­n

        ¥»¤å´`²î¤s«ä·Q¥»¨­¥Ñ¡m©ö¡n¾Ç®i¶}ªº¶i¸ô¡A±´°Q¡u¶Õ¡v³o¤@¦b²î¤s¸Ö¾Ç¤¤¬É©w§ç±¡¸Ö¥»½è·N¸qªº½dÃ¥¡C¥Ñ²î¤s¡m©ö¡n¾Ç¡A¤å³¹±À­l¡J¡u¶Õ¡v±j½Õ¤FÀ³¥Ñ¦t©zµL©lµL²×¡B¥Í¥Í¤£¤wªºÅܤơA¦Ó«D¥»Å骺Æ[©À¥h¬É©w¥@¬Éªº¥»½è¡C¦Ó²î¤s¾ú¥v­õ¾Ç¤¤¡u¶Õ¡vªº¹B¥Î¤S»¡©ú¡J¡u¶Õ¡v¨Ã«D»P­ì¦]½×©Î¥Øªº½×¬ÛÃöªº¡u«ÈÆ[³W«ß¡v¡A¦Ó¬OµLªk±q¤@¦¸©Êªº¾ú¥v¤¤©â¶H¥X¨Ó¡A¥ç¤£±Æ°£¯«¯¦·NÃѪº¤£¥iÁ×§K©Ê¡C¥H¦¹¬°°ò¦¡A¤å³¹¹ï²î¤s¸Ö¾Ç¤¤¡u¶Õ¡v·N²[©Ò¯A¤Îªº¡u®É¶¡¬[ºc¡v©M¡uªÅ¶¡¬[ºc¡v¨â¤è­±¶i¦æ±´°Q¡C­º¥ý¡A¥H¡u¶Õ¡v½×¸Ö¡A¹üÅã¤F¸Öªº¥»½è¤D¤H²ö¤§¯à´úªº°ÊºA¤¤¡u·N¡v¤§¶}Åã¡A¦Ó«DÃD¦®¡C¦]²î¤s¹ð­É®Ñªk½×¸Ö©M±j½Õ¡u¨¥¥¼¥i§Ñ¡v¡A¸Ö¦]¦Ó¬O¤@ºØ¬¡°Ê¡A¤@¨ü¤º¦b¥Í©R¤OÅX»ºªº¦æ¤å¹Lµ{¡C¦¹¥Í©R¤O¤S¥~©ó¸Ö¤H·N§Ó¾Þ±±¦Ó¨ã¦Û¥Í©Ê½è¡C¨ä¦¸¡A¦b¸Öªº·N¶H¥@¬É¤¤¡A«h¦p¦b¶Ç²Îµe½×©M³ôÁ־Ǥ¤¤@¼Ë¡A¡u¶Õ¡v±j½Õ¤F¡u±qÀR¤î¥h·Q¹³°ÊºA¡v¡A§Y¥H¸Ö¹Òµê²[¦t©zªº²³°Ê¤§¤Æ¡C¥Ñ¦¹¡A¸ÖºqÅé»{¥X¦t©z¤D¥R¤À¸`«µ¤Æªº®ÉªÅ¦P¤@Åé¡C¤å³¹³Ì«á´£¥X¡J²î¤s¥H¡u¶Õ¡v½×¸Öªº®Ú¥»·N¸q¦b©ó´¦§e¥X¤¤°ê¶Ç²Î¸Öºqªº¥»½è¡J¨ä«D¦è¤è¤å½×¡u¼±¥é¡v©Î¡uªí²{¡v·§©À©Ò¯à²[Äá¡A¨äºë¸q¹ê¦b¥HÃÀ³N­«¸q¦aÅé»{¦t©zªº«ß°Ê¡C¥¿¬O²î¤s¸Ö¾Ç¡A¦Ó«D¨ü¦ò¾ÇÀLµ@¤§­ð§º¸Ö¾Ç¤¤¡u·N¹Ò»¡¡v¡Aµo´­¤F»FºÝ¡m©P©ö¡nªº¤¤°ê¥DÅé¤å©úºë¯«¡C

 

 

Wang Fu-chih¡¦s Definition of Poetry in

Terms of ¡§Shih¡¨ and the Nature of Chinese

Lyrical Poetry

XIAO Chi

      The present essay uses Wang Fu-chih's study on The Classic of Changes, the foundation of his philosophical thought, as an avenue to approach the concept of shih, extremely significant to define the nature of Chinese lyrical poetry.

      By using shih Wang Fu-chih shows how the essence of the reality should not be defined ontologically but rather in terms of its continuous variations. The application of this concept to Wang's philosophy of history also demonstrates that the concept does not mean ¡§objective law of development¡¨ related to either etiology or teleology. Rather it designates an ineluctability which, somewhat mysteriously, cannot be drawn from unique historical events. From this perspective, the essay explores the meanings of this concept in the two main aspects that Wang's poetics involves, namely the temporal and the spatial framework of poetry.

      First of all, the concept reveals that the essence of poetry is not the theme, but the unpredictable dynamic process that unfolds the theme. Given Wang Fu-chih's use of calligraphy terminology and his high regard of language in discussing poetry, we can see how for him a poem is an activity, that is, an active linguistic process impelled by inner vitality. This vital impulse, however, is beyond the will of poet and therefore self-generated. Secondly, in the world of poetic imagery, like in the traditional theories of painting and geomancy, the concept of shih also emphasizes the idea of ¡§imagining the dynamic in terms of the static,¡¨ i.e., of imagining the lyric inner landscape contained within the continuity of cosmic variations. In this regard, the world of poetry betokens the universe as a fully harmonious temporal-spatial unity. The ultimate significance of Wang's discussion of poetry in terms of shih is its revelation of the nature of traditional Chinese lyrical poetry: artistic work tautologically embodies the rhythm of perpetual cosmic movement, that cannot be described by Western terms such as ¡§mimesis¡¨ or ¡§expression¡¨.  It is Wang Fu-chih's poetics, rather than the ¡§theory of lyric realm¡¨ influenced by Buddhism and flourished in T'ang and Sung dynasties, that represents and develops the ethos of the main Chinese civilization begun with The Classic of Changes.

 

Keywords: shih  Wang Fu-chih's Thought  

Study of The Classic of Changes    Chinese lyricism

viewing the cosmos as becoming

 

 

 

²_ ­° º[ ¹I ª@¢w¢w½×¡mÃèªá½t¡n©Ò±æ²×µêªº

¤Ñ¸ô¾úµ{

Àd  ¤ô  ¥É

´£  ­n

        ²{¥N¾ÇªÌ¹ï²M¥Nªø½g³¹¦^¤p»¡¡mÃèªá½t¡nªº½×­z¬Æ¹Ù¡A¯S§O¬O²Ä¤K¦^¦Ü¥|¤Q¦^¡A¡mÃèªá½t¡nªº¥@¬ÉÀH­ð±Îµ¥¤Hªº»·¬v¹CÂܦÓ¶¥X¤Ñ´Â¡uªù¤á¤s¡v¡A²¾¦Ü®ü¥~µ´°ì¤§°ê¡B®íÃþ¤§¤H¡A³Ì«á¤îªy©óªHµL¤HÂܪº®ü¥~·¥«n¤§¹Ò¢w¢w¤p½´µÜ¡A¤×¨ä¤Þµo¾ÇªÌ­Ì½Ñ¦h­±¦Vªº°Q½×¡CµM«h³oªø¹F¤T¤Q´X¦^ªº¥~°ì¹C¾ú¬G¨Æ¡A¦b¥þ®Ñµ²ºc¤Wªº©w¦ì¤Î¨ä«ÕÁôªº´J·N¡A¹ê¤´¦³±´¯ÁªºªÅ¶¡¡C¥»¤å¸Õ¹Ï³z¹L¡u²_­°¢w¢w¹Iª@¡vªº¦h­«½×ÅG¡A±N¡mÃèªá½t¡n³o½ë¤d°j¦ÊÂà¦Ó©l²×©w¦V©ó¤Ñ´Âªº¹I¯î¤§®È¡A©w¦ì¬°¡uÃèªá¤ô¤ë¡v¢w¢w©Ò±æ²×µêªº¤Ñ¸ô¾úµ{¡C¤@¤è­±±µ¤Þ®Ñ¤¤¨â¤j¥D½u¢w¢w²_­°¤U¬Éªº¦Ê¦W¤~¤k©b­u¤Ñ´Â¡B³x¤~ÄvÆvªº¤H¤å²±·|¡A¥H¤Î©¾¸q¤§®v¤Ï¥¿¡u¿ù¶Ã³±¶§¡vªº°°¤Ñ´Â¡B­««Ø§õ­ð¤Ñ´Â¥¿²Îªº¶Ô¤ý¤j·~¡F¥t¤@¤è­±¡A¨±°j¦a±H´J¨Ã²×µ²¤F¥\¦W¢ªº¶Ç²Î¤å¤H¦b¤Ñ´Âªº¯«¸t¥ú·Ó¤U¡A©Ò§@ªº¤@³õ³Ì´¶¹M¤]³ÌµLªkÄa¸Ñ©ó¤ßªºµnª@¤j¹Ú¡C

 

The Hopeless Road to Heaven in

Ching-hua Yuan

LO Shui-yu

      Many contemporary scholars have written about the traditional Chinese novel Ching-hua Yuan, Flowers in the Mirror: in particular, the account of the sea-bound voyage  of T'ang Ao and his companions-who sail from Mt. Man-hu in the Heavenly Kingdom to many foreign lands to finally alight on the desolate fairyland of Hsiao P'eng-lai (chaps. 8-40)― has attracted the attention of many critics. However, much remains to be investigated about this fantastic journey that spans over some thirty chapters and about its very important position in the overall structure of the book. The present essay tries to map out the process from Exile to Ascent and narrates how Exile and Ascent connect the two main narrative threads of the novel. On one hand, we have the arrival to Earth of the one hundred exiled flower-fairies and the gathering of literary talents who pursue both self-fulfillment and fame in the Heavenly Kingdom. On the other, we see the exiled loyalists who enact the restoration of the orthodox Earthly Kingdom, namely the T'ang dynasty.

      This intricate voyage, which begins and ends with the Heavenly Kingdom, also examines the destinies of the two protagonists, T'ang Ao and T'ang Hsiao-shan, who both go from exile to ascent, albeit by different means. Moreover, this journey depicts a world full of illusions in which the quest for life is destined to be in vain. The characters' final move far away from the Earthly Kingdom symbolizes an idealistic and hopeless quest for self-fulfillment and orthodoxy, quest which arises from the author's deepest desires and frustrations.

 

Keywords: Ching-hua Yuan    Flowers in the Mirror    quest

traditional Chinese fiction

 

 

 

¤ý©Z¤§¡q¼o²ø½×¡rªº¤Ï²ø«ä·Q¡J±q¥È¾Ç»P¤Ï¥È¾Ç¡B

²ø¾Ç»P¤Ï²ø¾Çªº¤¬°Ê½Í°_

©P  ¤j  ¿³

´£  ­n

      ÃQ®Ê¤§»Ú¾§®a¸g³N°I·L¦Ó¦Ñ²ø«ä·Q©ïÀY¡A¥È¾Ç®a©¹©¹¦¨¬°«á¥N¤H§åµû²M½Íµê¯B¤§­·¾É­P§Ãa¼Ö±Y¤¤­ì¶ÉÂЪº¸o»íº×­º¡C¦Û¥¿©l¥È¾Ç¦ó®Ë¡B¤ý´]©l¡A¥HµL¬°¥»¡A¡u±R¥»®§¥½¡v¡A¥ç§Y·|³q¤Õ¦Ñ¡A¸Ñ¨M¦ÛµM»P¦W±Ðªº½Ä¬ð¦¨¬°«ä·Q¥D¬y¡F¦Ó«áªº¦ËªL²ø¾Ç¿³²±¡A½Ä¨Mºôù¡A¬°²{¹êµê°°ªº¦W±Ð§ªk®i¶}¿E¯Pªº§å§P¡C´R±dªº¡u¶V¦W±Ð¦Ó¥ô¦ÛµM¡v¡A«o¦¨¤F¦è®Ê¤¸±d¥H­°¦W¤h­Ì»rßôÅSÁà¡B©ñ¿º¶V§ªºÂǤf¡A§Î¦¨ÄY­«ªº±ÑÃa­·®ð¡C±q¼Ö¼s¡u¦W±Ð¤¤¦Û¦³¼Ö¦a¡v¡B»p軪º¡m±R¦³½×¡n¨ì³¢¶Hªºª`¡m²ø¡n¡A¨ä¹ê³£¬O­nªÈ¥¿³oºØ¦ÛµM»P¦W±Ð¤§¶¡ªºµ´µõ¥Ù¬Þ¡A¸Õ¹Ï½Õ©M¤GªÌªººò±iÃö«Y¡C

        ¥È­·«n´ç¤§«á¡A¤¸±d¥H¨Óªº©ñ¿º¤§­·¨Ã¥¼µy·²¡A¦ÛµM»P¦W±Ðªº½Ä¬ð±q­ì¥»¬Fªv¯´§Çªº°ÝÃDÂàÅÜÂX¤j¬°ªÀ·|¯´§Ç®a±Ú­Û²z¤è­±¡A¦ÛµM»P¦W±ÐªºÃö«Y°ÝÃD¤´¥¼Àò±o¸Ñ¨M¡CªF®Êªº¥È¾Ç§Y¦b¤@ªÑ¥È§Âù²ç¡Bºî¦X¾§¹Dªº¾Ç³N­·®ð¤¤³vº¥¦¨§Î¡A¨ä¤¤¤ý©Z¤§ªº¡q¼o²ø½×¡r§Y¬°¥D­n¥Nªí¡C¤ý©Z¤§¬°ªF®Ê¤¤´Á¥D­n«ä·Q®a¡A¥´µÛ¡u¼o²ø¡vªº¤f¸¹¡A§å§P·í®Éªº²M½Íµê¯B¤§­·¡C¡q¼o²ø½×¡r»{¬°¡J¡]¤@¡^²ø¤l¿Wºc¤§°Û¡A¦³ÅéµL¥Î¡F¡]¤G¡^²ø¤l¤§¾Ç¾É­P¿º¸v­·®ð¡F¡]¤T¡^¦^Âk¡u¦b¾§«D¾§¡A«D¹D¦³¹D¡vªº¤Õ¦Ñ¤§¾Ç¡C¡q¼o²ø½×¡r§åµû¡u²ø¥Í§@¦Ó­·«UÀZ¡v¡A³y¦¨¤F©ñ®ö¤§­·¡A¥Øªº¦b©ó¦^Âk¡u¤Õ¦Ñ¤§¾Ç¡v¡A¤Ï¬M¤FªF®Êºî¦X¾§¹Dªº¾ãÅé¤è¦V¡Cµ²½×«ü¥X¡A¡q¼o²ø½×¡r¦b¥È¾Ç¥v¤Wªº·N¸q¦b©ó¡A©IÀ³¦^Âk¥¿©l¥È¾Ç·|³q¤Õ¦Ñªº¥ß³õ¡C±qÃQ®Ê¥È¾Çªºµo®i»P¦ËªL²ø¾Ç¥H­°ªº¥È¾Ç»P¤Ï¥È¾Ç¡B²ø¾Ç»P¤Ï²ø¾Çªº¤Ï¬Ù¯ßµ¸¬Ý¨Ó¡A¥È¾Ç®a­Ì»{¬°®É¥N©ñ¿º¤§­·¨Ã«D¡u©õ§^¤Õ¦Ñ¡A©T¤w¨¥¤§¡vªº¥È¾Ç¥D¬y©ÒÀ³©Ó¾áªº°ÝÃD¡C¡q¼o²ø½×¡r¹ï©ó²ø¤lªº§åµû¡A¨£¤¯¨£´¼¡A¦ý¥¦ªí©ú¤F¡A§â©ñ¿º­·®ðÂk¸o©ó¦ó®Ë¡B¤ý´]·|³q¤Õ¡B¦Ñªº¥¿©l¥È¾Ç¬OµLªk¦¨¥ßªº¡C

 

Wang T¡¦an-chih¡¦s ¡§An Essay on

Abolishing Chuang-tzu¡¨

CHOW Ta-hsing

      Wang T'an-chih (330-375) was an important politician and thinker of the Mid-Eastern Chin dynasty, as well as a famous exponent of the later Wei-Chin hsuan-hsueh. His ¡§An Essay on Abolishing Chuang-tzu¡¨ is indeed one of the most representative works of harmonizing Confucianism and Taoism in Eastern Chin philosophy. With proper perspective from criticism and reflection on the liberating atmosphere of this period, and looking at it in terms of the whole philosophical development of hsuan-hsueh, we can rightly comprehend the opposition between Wang T'an-chih and Chuang-tzu.

        This paper studies first of all the thought expressed in Wang T'an-chih's essay vis-à-vis the earlier topics in hsuan-hsueh. Consequently, the author proceeds to analyze this text's relevant points and theoretical basis, by explaining its relationship to Confucius and Lao-tzu. Finally, in the conclusion, the author illuminates ¡§An Essay on Abolishing Chuang-tzu¡¨'s role within the context of the history of hsuan-hsueh in the Wei-Chin period.

 

Keywords: Wang T'an-chih    ¡§An Essay on Abolishing Chuang-tzu¡¨

hsuan-hsueh    Confucius/Lao-tzu School

 

 

 

ªk  Âà ªº  ºØ  ©Ê  Æ[

¹ù  ©ú  ¬¡

´£  ­n

      ¤j­¼¦ò±Ð¥H¦¨¦ò¬°Âk±J¡A¥Ñ¬O¬O§_¤@¤Á²³¥Í³£¨ã¦³¦¨¦òªº¯à¤O¡A¥i¥H³q¹L¤Æ¾É©M¦æ½î¡A¦ÓÃÒ±o¦òªG¡A¤D¬O¤j­¼«ä·Qªº¤¤¤ß°ÝÃD¡C¥Ñ©ó¤£¦P¤j­¼¸g½×¡B¬Æ¦Ü¦P¤@ªº¤j­¼¸g½×ªº¤£¦P³¡¤À¡A¦b³o°ÝÃD©Òªí²{ªº¥ß³õ¨Ã¤£¤@­P¡A¥H¦Ü¤¤°ê¦ò±Ð«ä·Q¬É´N³o°ÝÃD¥X²{ª§Ä³¡C­ð´Âªì¦~¥È®N¡]¬ù602-664¡^¤Î¨äªù¤U´£¥X¤­ºØºØ©Êªº»¡ªk¡A¥D±i¦³¨Ç¤G­¼²³¥Í©MµL©Ê¦³±¡­ì¨Ó¨S¦³¦òªººØ©Ê¡A¦]¦Ó¥Ã»·¤£¯à¦¨¦ò¡A§â³oª§½×±À¦Ü°ª®p¡C¥»¤å±´°QµØÄY©vªº³Ð¥ß¤HªkÂá]643-713¡^¹ï¤­ºØºØ©Ê©M¨ä¬ÛÃöÆ[©Àªº¬Ýªk¡C

        ªkÂÃ¥D­nÀô¶§P±Ð¡A¥Ó¥Ü¥L¹ïºØ©Ê°ÝÃDªº¬Ýªk¡A¦]¦¹¥»½×¤å²Ä¤@¸`­º¥ý³q¹LªR­zªkÂéҴ£¥X¡u¨âºØ¤j­¼¡v¡B¡u¤­±Ð¡vµ¥§P±Ð¤ÀÃþùئ³ÃöºØ©Ê°ÝÃDªº¦a¤è¡AÅã¥ÜªkÂêººØ©ÊÆ[ªº¤j­n¡C¥»¤å²Ä¤G©M²Ä¤T¸`¼fµøªkÂù﨣©ó¸g½×ªº¡u©w©Ê¤G­¼¡v©M¡uµL©Ê¦³±¡¡vÆ[©À©Ò§@¸àÄÀ¡A¬Ý¥L¦p¦ó³q¹L©âªÅ³o¨ÇÆ[©À­ì¦³ªº¥ý¤Ñ©w©Êªº²[·N¡A±j½Õ¨S¦³²³¥Í¬O¥ý¤Ñ¨M©w¤£¯à¦¨¦ò¡A¦Ü¦Ó´£¥X¡u¤G­¼°j¤ß¡v©M¡u¥þ¤À¦³©Ê¡vªº¥D±i¡C¥»¤å²Ä¥|¸`À˵øªkÂùï¡u¥þ¤À¦³©Ê¡v»¡ªk¬°Â_¦ò§Q¥L¥\¼w³o§åµû©Ò§@µªÅG¡A¨Ã±´°QªkÂô£¥X¦òºØ©Ê¹M³qµL±¡¤§ª«³o»¡ªkªº¸q²z®Ú¾Ú¡C

 

Fa-tsang¡¦s Interpretation of the Buddhist

Idea of Gotra

LIU Ming-wood

      Whether all sentient beings can attain Buddhahood is a central problem in Mahayana Buddhism. The controversy over this issue came to a head in China during the seventh century, when Hsuan-tsang and his followers put forward the theory of five ¡§lineages¡¨ (gotras) maintaining that there are three groups of sentient beings, i.e. those of sravaka lineage, those of pratyekabuddha lineage and those without lineage, who can never realize Buddhahood due to their lack of Buddhànature. This paper examines the reaction of Fa-tsang (643-713), the actual founder of the Hua-yen School and a fervent advocate of the thesis of universal Buddhahood, to the theory of gotras and its related concepts. The paper begins with an exhaustive account of Fa-tsang's attempt to establish a correlation between various opinions on the subject of gotra with various levels of Buddhist teaching, with a view to relegating Hsuan-tsang's theory of five lineages to an inferior form of Buddhist teaching. It goes on to examine the way Fa-tsang reinterprets concepts in the scriptures often cited to support the theory of five lineages, with an eye to demonstrating that no sentient being is destined to be excluded from Buddhahood forever. It concludes with a discussion of Fa-tsang's replies to a number of criticisms raised against his thesis of universal Buddhahood, and an explanation of Fa-tsang's novel idea of the Buddha-gotra embracing both the realms of the sentient and the non-sentient.

 

Keywords: tathagatagarbha    classification of teachings    gotra

Hsuan-tsang    Fa-tsang    Hua-yen School

 

 

 

¦Û§Úªº«ÈÅ餯»P´¶¹M¤Æ¢w¢wªñ¥N¤é¥»ªº¡uªF¬v¡v½×

¤ÎÁô°Î¨ä¤¤ªº¡u¦è¬v¡v»P¡u¤ä¨º¡v

³¯  Þ³  ªâ

´£  ­n

        ¦V¨ÓªºµØ»y¡B¤é»y¡B­^»y¥@¬É¡A¹ï¡uªF¬v¡v¤@Ã㪺ÄÀ¸q¬O¤Àª[ªº¡CµØ»y¥@¬É©M­^»y¥@¬É¤£½×¦b¤è¦ì©Î¬O·§©À¤W¡A³£¥H¡u§Ú¡v¬°¤¤¤ß¡A§â¡uªF¬v¡v²z¸Ñ¬°¡u»·¤è¤§¦a¡v©Î¡uÆZ¦i¤§¦a¡v¡F¦Ó¥H¾§±Ð¤å¤Æ¶Ç¤H¦Û®Ýªº¤é¥»¡A«o¥¼©ÓÄ~¤¤°ê¶Ç²Î¹ï¡uªF¬v¡vªº¸ÑÄÀ¡A¦Ó¿ï¾Ü§â¡u§Ú¡v²[¬A¤J¡uªF¬v¡vªº¦a°ì½d³ò¡Aµø¤§¬°¦Û§Ú©ÒÁõÄݪº¨È¬w¤å¤Æ¤§²ÎºÙ¡C«ö·Ó¬z¥Ð¥ª¥k¦N¡]1873-1961¡^ªº»¡ªk¡A¡uªF¬v¡v·N²[¬O¦bªñ¥N¤~¾D¨üª¾ÃÑ¥÷¤l©Ò§ó©ö¡A¦Ó³oºØ§@¬°¤@¤è­±¬O­n®ø«Ú¶Ç²Î¥H¤¤°ê¤å¤Æ¡]¾§±Ð«ä·Q¡^¬°¤å¤Æ®Ú·½ªº·NÃÑ¡A±À¦æ¤é¥»¤~¯u¥¿Ä~©ÓªF¨È¶Ç²Î¡B¤é¥»«ä·Q¤¤¦­¤w¥¥¨|ªF¤è«ä·Q¥»·½ªºÆ[ÂI¡F¤@¤è­±¬O¦b­±¹ï±j¶Õªº¦è¬v¤å¤Æ®É¡A¤]½á»P¤é¥»ªº«ä·Q¤å¤Æ¥H¤@ºØ´¶¹Mªº»ù­È¡A¨Ó¬Û¹ï§Ü¿Å¡C´«¨¥¤§¡A¾§±Ð¦b©úªv¤Q¦~¥N¡]¤@¤K¤K¢¯¦~¥N¡^¡A¦ñÀH°ê®a¥D¸qªº¿³°_¡A¦A«×Àò¿ï¬°´À¬FÅv¥¿·í©ÊÅGÅ@ªº¤u¨ã¡A§ïÀY´«­±¦¨¡u¨È²Ó¨È½×¡v¦A¥Í¡A¨ä­«­nªº®Ñ¼g§Î¦¡¡A´N¬OÀô¶µÛ¡uªF¬v­õ¾Ç¡v¡B¡uªF¬v«ä·Q¡v¡B¡uªF¬v­Û²z¡v¡uªF¬v¤å¤Æ¡v¡B¡uªF¬v¤H¡v¡B¡uªF¬v¾Ç¡v¡B¡uªF¬v¥v¡vµ¥µ¥¡A´Â¦V¡u¦è¬v¡vªº¬Û¹ï¤Æ¦L°O¡uªF¬v¡v©Ò§e²{ªº½×­z¡C¥»¤å¥D­n±´°Q¡uªF¬v¡v¤@»y¦b¤¤°ê¤å¤ÆÅé¨t¤¤ªº§Î¦¨»Pµo®i¡A¦A»EµJ©óªñ¥N¤é¥»¡A¿ï¾Ü´¿¹ï¡uªF¬v¡v´£¥X¨ãÅé½×­zªº¤«¤W­õ¦¸­¦¡]1855-1944¡^¡B©£­Ü¤Ñ¤ß¡]1862-1932¡^¡B¦è®Ê¤@­¦¡]1873-1943¡^¡B¬z¥Ð¥ª¥k¦N¡B¾ï¾ë¡]1881-1945¡^¡B¦Ë¤º¦n¡]1910-1977¡^µ¥¤»¤H¡A«ö¨ä¡uªF¬v¡v½×¥X²{ªº¶¶§Ç¡A°t¦X®É¥N­I´º¡A¤ÀªRª¾ÃÑ¥÷¤l©Ò¤Ä°Çªº¡uªF¬v¡v¹³¡B©Mªñ¥N¤é¥»¡uªF¬v¡v½×ªººtÅÜ¡C¤º®e°¼­«©óªñ¥N¤é¥»ªºª¾ÃÑ¥÷¤l¤§¦Û§Ú»{¦P»P¦Û§Ú¸àÄÀ¡B¹ï¤å¤Æ¦å½tªº¦^Âk»P¶W¶V¡F¥H¤Î¡uªF¬v¡v½×­z¤¤¼çÂÃ¥¼²{ªº¡B¡u¤é¥»¤H¡v­±¹ï¡u¦è¬v¡v»P¡u¤ä¨º¡v®Éªº¬Û¹ï·NÃÑ¡C

 

 

The Objectivization and Universalization

of the Self―A Critical Look at the

Japanese Touyou Discourse and the Ideas

of Seiyou and Shina Implied Therein

CHEN Wei-fen

       The term ¡§Tung-yang¡¨ (Touyou) holds different meanings in the English-, Japanese-, and Chinese-speaking worlds. In both Western and Chinese society, the center of the world was constructed, both geographically and conceptually, in terms of ¡§we¡¨, ¡§us¡¨; and ¡§ours¡¨, while terms such as ¡§Tung-yang¡¨ were understood as ¡§distant, barbarian places.¡¨ The Japanese, who prided themselves as the real descendant of Confucian culture, did not follow the Chinese interpretation of ¡§Tung-yang¡¨ but chose to be included in the Tung-yang region, and use the term to indicate the Asian culture that they belonged to.

      According to Tsuda Soukichi (1873-1961), the interpretations of ¡§Tung-yang¡¨ underwent a change in the hands of intellectuals in the early eras of modern Japan. Eliminating the idea that Confucianism is the cultural origin of Japan, they promoted the concept that Japanese philosophy was the genuine successor of Asian traditions. Furthermore, they wanted to give Japanese philosophy an universal value that would complete the dominant Western culture. Accompanying the rise of nationalism in Japan in the 1880s, Confucianism was taken as the most effective tool for justifying political issues. It was reborn into a brand new ¡§Asian discourse¡¨ which took form in such key phrases as ¡§Tung-yang philosophy¡¨, ¡§Tung-yang thought¡¨ and ¡§Tung-yang history¡¨, to emphasize a discourse oriented towards ¡§Tung-yang¡¨ as opposed to ¡§Hsi-yang¡¨ (Western).

      The present article explores the formation and development of the term ¡§Tung-yang¡¨ in the context of Chinese culture, as well as its definitions in modern Japan, based on the discussion of Inoue Tetsujiro (1855-1944), Okakura Tenshin(1862-1932), Nishi Shinichiro(1873-1943), Tsuda Soukichi, Tachibana Shiraki(1881-1945) and Takeuchi Yoshimi(1910-1977). A special attention is given to modern Japanese intellectuals' self-identification and self-interpretation, their returning to, and transcending of their own culture, as well as to their efforts to uncover the Japanese unconsciousness as a rival of, and an opposition to, Western and Chinese cultures.

 

Keywords: Touyou    Tung-yang    Shina    Oriental    East

West    modern Japan