¡@
±q±Ô¨Æ¤å¾Ç¨¤«×¬Ý¡m¥ª¶Ç¡n¡m°ê»y¡nªºÃö«Y
¤ý ¹t ¦t
´£¡@n
¡@¡@¡m¥ª¶Ç¡n»P¡m°ê»y¡n¤G®Ñ¤§¶¡ªºÃö«Y¡A¾ú¨Ó¾ÇªÌ°Q½×ªº«Ü¦h¡A¦ý¦h¥Ñ¤º®e¡B¤å¦r¡B¤åªk¡B»y·Jµ¥¤è±¤J¤â¡C¥»¤å«h¹Á¸Õ±q±Ô¨Æ¤å¾Ç¨¤«×¡A¹ï¦¹¤@½ÒÃD§@¶i¤@¨B¤§±´°Q¡A¨Ã¥H¤G®Ñ©Ò¸üªº¡u¥Ó¥Í¤§¦º¡v¨Æ¥ó¬°¹ê¨Ò¡A«¥[¤ÀªR¡Cµ²ªG©M¤j¦h¼Æ¾ÇªÌªº¬Ýªk¤@P¡A§Y¤G®Ñ¬J«D¥Ñ¤@®Ñ¤Æ¤À¦Ó¦¨¡A¥ç«D¥Ñ¤@¤H©Ò§@¡C¾¨ºÞ¦p¦¹¡A¤G®Ñ¶¡ÅãµM¤]¦s¦bµÛ«D¤ñ´M±`ªº±K¤ÁÃö«Y¡C´N¥Ó¥Í¨Æ¥ó¨Ó¬Ý¡A¤£¦ý¤G®Ñ©Ò±Ô²Ó¸`¦h©Ò¹p¦P¡A¦³®É¬Æ¦Ü³s±¹Ãã¤]§¹¥þ¤@¼Ë¡C¦b©|µLªkÃÒ¹ê¤G®Ñ©Ò¨ú®Æ¬Û¦P¤§«e¡A¦Ó¡m°ê»y¡n½s¼gªÌ´¿±Ä¥Î¹L¡m¥ª¶Ç¡nªº¥i¯à©Ê¤S·L¥G¨ä·L¡A¡m¥ª¶Ç¡n§@ªÌ´¿°Ñ¦Ò¨Ã±Ä¥Î¹L¡m°ê»y¡nªº¥i¯à©ÊÀ³¥i¦s¦b¡C
¡@
An
Examination of the Relation between Tso-chuan and Kuo-yu from the Viewpoint
of Narrative Literature
John C.Y.Wang
¡@¡@The issue of the textual relation between Tso-chuan and
Kuo-yu has been extensively discussed by scholars. Most of them¡Ahowever¡Ahave
written in terms of content, language, grammar, and vocabulary. The present study is an
attempt to reexamine the issue from the point of view of narrative literature, using the
narrative of Shen-sheng as an actual example. The result of this new study tallies well
with the prevailing view among academic circles: the two books were not off-shoots of one
common larger work; nor were they written by one common author. The fact remains, however,
that the two books seem to bear an unusually close relationship with each other. In the
narrative of Shen-sheng, for example, not only many of the details narrated are similar,
but there is an uncanny resemblance in wording in places as well. Three possible
explanations for this intriguing phenomenon maybe advanced: that the two authors involved
used the same original materials, that the author of Tso-chuan had consulted kuo-yu,
and vice versa. Given the evidence available now, the second explanation would seem to be
the most plausible of the three.
Keywords:
Tso-chuan Kuo-yunarrative literature
¡@
¡@
µØÄY©v©Ê°_«ä·Qªº§Î¦¨
¹ù ©ú ¬¡
´£¡@n
¡@¡@¡u©Ê°_¡vÆ[©À¦bµØÄY±Ð¾Ç¸Ì¦û¦³«n¦ì¸m¡A¥v®a¨C§â¥¦¸ò¤Ñ»O©vªº¡u©Ê¨ã¡vÆ[©À¹ïÁ|¡Aµø¤§¬°µØÄY©v«ä·Qªº¥Dn¼ÐÃÑ¡C¥»¤å¹ï©Ê°_Æ[©Àªº¨Ó·½¤Î¨ä¦b¦´ÁµØÄY©v±Ð¾Ç¸Ìªº·N¸q§@¥X¤ÀªR¡C¡u©Ê°_¡vÆ[©À·½¥X¤»¤Q¨÷¥»¡mµØÄY¸g¡n¤§¡q¦p¨Ó©Ê°_«~¡r¡A¦Ó¦¹«~©Ò¿×¡u©Ê°_¡v¡A°ò¥»¤W¬O«ü¦p¨Ó©ÒÅã²{ªº¦UºØ©Ê¬Û¡C¤S¦¹«~¤Àz¦p¨Ó©ÒÅã²{½Ñ©Ê¬Û¡A¦b»¡©ú¦p¨Óªº´¼¼z©Ê©Mı©Ê¬°µL©Ò¤£¤Î®É¡A´£¥X¤@¤Á²³¥Í±x¨ã¦p¨Óªº´¼¼z©Ê©Mı©Êªº»¡ªk¡C³o»¡ªk¦bµØÄY©v±Ð¾Çªº©l³ÐªÌ´¼Åk¡]602-668¡^ªºµÛ§@¸Ì¡A±o¨ì¶}®i¡A¦¨¬°´¼Åkªº©Ê°_«ä·Qªº¥D²´¡C¤S´¼Åk¬É©w¤F¡u©Ê°_¡v¤@Ã㪺²[¸q¡A¹ï¡u©Ê°_¡v¸ò¡u½t°_¡vªºÃö«Y¡B¡u©Ê°_¡v¸ò¡u½tסvªº¤À§Oµ¥°ÝÃD¡A³£¦³²M·¡»¡©ú¡A³þ©w¤FµØÄY©v©Ê°_«ä·Qªº°ò¦¡C´¼Åkªº§Ì¤lªkÂá]643-713¡^¬°µØÄY©v±Ð¾ÇÅé¨tªº«Ø¥ßªÌ¡CªkÂð£¤F¹³´¼Åk¯ë¦Û²³¥Í¦]¦aªº¼h±Á¿©Ê°_¥~¡A¦P®É¥ç±q¦p¨ÓªG¦aªº¼h±³¯z©Ê°_¡C§óȱoª`·NªÌ¡A¬OªkÂçâ©Ê°_Æ[©À¸òµØÄY±Ð¾Çªº¤@§Y¤@¤Á¡B¬Û¿ÄµLꪺ¦t©zÆ[³sµ²¡A±q¦Ó¬ð¥X¤F©Ê°_Æ[©À¦bµØÄY«ä·Q¾ãÅ骺·N¸q¡C
¡@
The
Formation of the Teaching of "Nature Origination" in Hua-yen Buddhism
Liu Ming-wood
¡@¡@The teaching of "nature origination" (hsing-ch'i©Ê°_)
is generally regarded as an important component of Hua-yen thought, and this paper
examines its origin and early history. The term "nature origination" is derived
from the title of chapter 30 of the 6O chuan version of the Avatamsaka Sutra, where
it is used to refer to the manifestation of the characteristics of the Buddha. On
depicting the Buddha's characteristics of wisdom and enlightenment, the Sutra speaks about
their presence in every sentient being; and this thought of the omnipresence of the
Buddha's nature of enlightenment underlies the teaching of nature-origination of Chih-yen
´¼Åk (602-668) and Fa-tsang ªkÂà (643-713), the founders of the Hua-yen School
µØÄY©v. Both Chih-yen and Fa-tsang use ideas denoting man's inherent essence of
enlightenment, such as "Buddha-nature" and "tathagatagarbha" to
explain the meaning of "nature origination". Both contrast the teaching of
"nature origination" with the teachings of "dependent origination" (yuan-ch'i½t°_)
and "conditioned practice" (yuan-hsiu½t×), with an eye to highlighting
the notion of inherent enlightenment. Different from Chih-yen's exposition of "nature
origination" which focuses on the aspect of cause, Fa-tsang’s interpretation of
"Nature origination" comphasizes the aspect of fruit. Fa-tsang further eonneets
the teaching of "Nature origination"with the Hua-yen teaching of universal
harmony, presenting the former as the theoretical basis of the latter.
Keywords:
Buddha-nature¡@¡@¡@ Chih-yen
¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@conditioned practice¡@¡@¡@ dependent
origination
¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@essence of enlightenment¡@¡@¡@ Fa-tsang ¡@¡@¡@Hua-yen
School
¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@nature-origination¡@¡@¡@ tathagatagarbha
¡@
¡@
Ãý«ß¤ÀªR¦b§ºµü¬ã¨s¤W
¤§·N¸q
ªL ª´ »ö
´£¡@n
¡@¡@¥jÄy¹q¸£¤ÆÁö¬O¥²µM¤§ÁͶաA¦ý¤@¯ë¥u¬O´£¨Ñ¥þ¤åÀ˯Á¡A¥Hµü¾Ç¤è±»¡¡A¥u¯à´N§@ªÌ¡BµüµP¡B¦r¼Æ¡Bµü·J¡B¶½X¤Îµü§@¥¿¤å¬d¸ß¡AÕYn¬d¸ß¡m¥þ§ºµü¡n¤¤¡A¦³¦h¤ÖÅ馡¬°¡mµüÃСn¡B¡mµü«ß¡n©Ò¥¢¦¬¡H§ºµü¤¤¨s¦³¦h¤Ö¤£¦P¤§¨óÃý¤è¦¡¡H¤G®a¤¬¨£¤§µü§@¨s¦³¦h¤Ö¡H¤D¦Ü¦b¥ô¤@§@®a¤§µü§@¤¤¡A¬Y¦r´¿¥Î»P¦ó¦r¨óÃýµ¥¡A«hµLªk´£¨Ñ¡C¬O¬Gµ§ªÌ°w¹ï¥þ¤åÀ˯Á¤§ª¼ÂI¡A¥t¦æ³]p¡u¥þ§ºµü¡vÀ˯Á¨t²Î¡C±Nð¦c¼ý¡m¥þ§ºµü¡n¤Î¤Õ¤Z§¡m¥þ§ºµü¸É¿è¡n¤G®Ñ©Ò¦¬¡A¦@¤G¸U¤@¤d¤T¦Ê¤E¤Qºµü¡]§t¦s¥Ø¡^¤§§@ªÌ¡BµüµP¡B¦r¼Æ¡B½Õ¦¡¡BÃý¦rµ¥¿é¤J¹q¸£¡A°£¨ÑÂk¯Ç¤Î¹ï¦¹¥~¡A©|¥i¨ÌÃýªk±N¦r§@¨tÁp¡A§@¬°µüÃý¬ã¨s¤§«n¸ê®Æ¡C
¡@¡@¥»¤å¦®¦b»¡©ú«Ø¥ß¦¹¸ê®Æ®w¤§¤èªk¥H¤Î¨ä¦bµü¾Ç¬ã¨s¤W»ùÈ¡A¤À¬°¨â¤j³¡¤À¡G
¡@¡@¤@¡B»¡©ú¦b«Ø¥ßÃýÃÐÀ˨t²Î®ÉÁ{¤§§xÃø¡A¥Dn¦³¥|ÂI¡G
¡@¡@¡@1.ª©¥»¤£¦P©Ò§Î¦¨¤§§xÂZ¡A
¡@¡@¡@2.¯}ªk¦³»~¦Ó³y¦¨¤§®t²§¡A
¡@¡@¡@3.¤À¤ù¤£¦P¦Ó³y¦¨¤§§xÂZ¡A
¡@¡@¡@4.¨óÃý»P§_©Ò¾ÉP¤§§xÃø¡C
¡@¡@¤G¡B»¡©úÃý«ß¤ÀªR¹ïµü¾Ç¬ã¨s´£¨Ñ¤§°^Äm¡A¥Dn¦³¤CÂI¡G
¡@¡@¡@1.q¸É¬J¦³¤§µü½Õ¤ÎÅ馡¡A
¡@¡@¡@2.¿ë»{ì¤w¥¢¥h¤§µü½Õ¦W¡A
¡@¡@¡@3.¦³§U©óµü§x´b¤§¸Ñ¨M¡A
¡@¡@¡@4.¥i®Õ¹ï«½g¤Î©MÃý¤§§@¡A
¡@¡@¡@5.¦³§U©ó¨óÃý¤è¦¡¤§¤F¸Ñ¡A
¡@¡@¡@6.¥iÂç²M½Õ¦W¦P²§¤§§xÂZ¡A
¡@¡@¡@7.¦³§U©óÃý³¡¤À¦X¤§¬ã¨s¡C
¡@
The Significance of
Yun-Lu Analysis in
Studies of Song
Ci
Lin Mei-yi
¡@¡@Although the computerization of classical texts has become
inevitable, its use is still limited to on-line index search. In terms of ci
studies, it only offers help to inquiries such as authors, tune titles, numbers of
characters, vocabularies, frequencies of certain words, page numbers, and texts. However,
computerization has offered little help to questions such as how many modes in Quansongci
are not included in Cipu and Cilu? how many rhyming patterns are there in Song
ci? how many ci works are attributed to more than one author? and in works of a certain
author, what characters rhyme with a certain character? Aiming to eliminate the blind
spots of on-line index search, I have established a new system of Quansongci index
search. I have therefore keyed in the 21, 390 ci works in Tang Guizhang's Quansongci
and kong Fanli's Quansongci buji, including their authors, tune titles,
numbers of characters, patterns, and rhymed characters. The new system can be used not
only for compare and contrast, but for associating rhymed characters according to rhyming
patterns.
¡@¡@This essay attempts to demonstrate the methodology used to
establish this new index system as well as the value of it in ci studies. It is divided
into two parts:
¡@¡@1.It explains the difficulties in establishing the yunpu
index system. There are fur problems: (l) there are multiple editions; (2) there are
variations caused by mistakes of pofa; (3) there are cases of confusion caused by
variations of fenpian; (4) there are ambiguities caused by the existence or
non-existence of rhyming.
¡@¡@2.It explicates the value of yun-lu analysis in ci
studies. It makes seven major contributions: (l) it supplements the musical modes and
styles known to us; (2) it traces the names of musical modes that have been lost; (3) it
clarifies cases of confusion in ci studies; (4) it offers access to repetitions and
matching works; works; (5) it enables us to understand rhyming patterns; (6) it helps to
solve the problem of names of modes; (7) it benefits the study of
yunbu.
Keywords:
Cilu ¡@¡@¡@Cipu¡@¡@¡@ Quansongci ¡@¡@¡@Quansongci
buji
¡@¡@¡@¡@Songci ¡@¡@¡@Ciyun¡@¡@¡@ meter¡@¡@¡@ cilu¡@¡@¡@
cipu
¡@¡@¡@¡@cipai (tune title)¡@¡@¡@ cidiao(musical mode)¡@¡@¡@
¡@¡@¡@¡@diaoshi (pattern)¡@¡@¡@ fenpian¡@¡@¡@ pofa¡@¡@¡@
¡@¡@¡@¡@index of the on-line search¡@¡@¡@ Wan Shu¡@¡@¡@
¡@¡@¡@¡@Tang Guizhang Kong Fanli
¡@
¡@
±q¼B¤T§^¡m©s¤l¸`¤å¡n½×§gÅvªº¨î»Pª¾ÃÑ¥÷¤l¤§
¦Û¥D©Ê
¦¶ ºa ¶Q
´£¡@n
¡@¡@©ú¤Ó¯ª©R¥O¼B¤ý§^(1313-1399)§R¡m©s¤l¡n¤¤¤£«K©ó¥L±M¨î²Îªv¤§³B¦Ó§@¦¨¡m©s¤l¸`¤å¡n¡C¥»¤å¥Ñ¡m©s¤l¸`¤å¡n¨Ó°Q½×¾§®aªº¸g¨å¬O§_¨ã¦³¯«¸t»P§¹¾ã©Ê¡A¨¬¥H¤@¤è±¨Ï§gÅv¥¿·í¤Æ¡A¦P®É¥ç¥i²o¨î§gÅvµL¨îªºÂX®i¡A§¹¦¨ª¾ÃÑ¥÷¤l¤§¦Û¥D©Ê¡C
¡@¡@±q¡m©s¤l¸`¤å¡nªº½s¼¶¹Lµ{¤¤¡A§ÚÌ¥i¥H¬Ý¥X§Y¨Ï¦b¬ÓÅv·¥«×°ªº¦ªº±¡ªp¤U¡A¦b®£©Æ¬FªvÀ±º©ªÀ·|ªº§x¹Ò¤¤¡A¾§ªÌ¤´Â¾֦³¬Û·í¤jªº¸ê·½¤Î«Ü°ªªº¦a¦ì¨Ó¤Ï§Ü¼É¬FªºÀ£¢¡C¸g¨åªº¶Ç²Î¤Î§¨îªºÅv«Â³£¦b¬ÓÅv¤§¤W¡A¥i¥H§@¬°¤ä«ù¾§ªÌ§Üª§ªº¹D¼w©Ê¤Î¬Fªv©Ê¤§¨Ì¾Ú¡C¦b²z½×¤W¡A¾§®a¶Ç²Î¬O«Ò¨î¦Xªk©Êªº¨Ì¾Ú¡C©Ò¥H¬Ó«ÒµLªk¥þ±ªº¡B¥¿±ªº¤Ï§Ü¾§®a¶Ç²Î¡A³y¦¨¦Û¤v²ÎªvÅv¤Oªº°Ê·n¡C¦P®É¬Ó«Ò¨Ã¨S¦³¾Ö¦³¸àÄÀ¾§¾Çªº°ß¤@ªºÅv¤O¡A©Ò¥H¾§ªÌ´N¨ã¦³§åµû¡B¤Ï§Ü¡u©x¤è¡v«ä·Qªº¤O¶q»P¨¥÷¡C¦ý¬O¾§ªÌªº¦Û¥D©Ê©Î§Üª§Åv¤O±q¨Ó¨S¦³³Q¨î«×¤Æ¡A¦]¦¹¨S¦³¦b¾ú¥v¤W¥R¤Àµo´§¥¦ªºÂ¾Åv¤Î¼ç¤O¡C
¡@
The Scope of the Imperial Power and the Autonomy of the
Intellectuals in the Early Ming: Reflections on the Meng-tzu chieh-wen
Chu Ron-guey
¡@¡@The autocratic emperor Ming T'ai-tsu ordered his minister
Liu San-wu (l313-1399) to purge those passages in the Mencius that are not
beneficial to his authoritarian rule. The result was a expurgated version of the classic,
which was decreed as the standard for the civil service examination. This article
discusses the contents of the expurgated text and its implications regarding the dynamic
tension between the emperor and the Confucian intellectuals.
Keywords:
Meng Tzu ¡@¡@¡@Ming T'ai-tsu
¡@
¡@
ù¾ã©aªº²z®ð½×
Áé ±m ¶v
´£¡@n
¡@¡@ù¾ãµÚ¬O©ú¥Nµ{¦¶¾Ç¬£ªº«n¥Nªí¡A«o¥H¡u²z®ð¬°¤@¡v
¤§»¡µÛºÙ¡Aªñ´X¤Q¦~§ó¬°¤¤°ê¤j³°¾Ç¬É²±±À¬°¡u°ßª«¥D¸q¡v¡C¥»¤å¥Øªº¦b¤ÀªR¾ãµÚ²z®ð½×ªº¤º²[¡A¥H¨D±o¥¿½Tªº©w¦ì¡C
¡@¡@µ§ªÌ¥H¬°¾ãµÚªº²z®ð½×¦³¹L´çªº¡B§é°Jªº©Ê®æ¡A¥L¤@¤è±©Ó»{®ðªº¨M©w©Ê®æ¡A¤@¤è±¤S°í«ù²zªº«í©w»PµL©Ò¤£¦b¡Aµ²ªG³y¦¨¡u²z®ð´ý¤@¡B²z¤@¤À®í¡vªº¾Ç»¡¡A¦P®ÉÝÅU²z»P®ðªº«n©Ê¡C
¡@¡@¬°¤F§Ë²M¾ãµÚ²z®ð½×ªº§ÎºA¡Aµ§ªÌ¤S¨ú©ú¹D¡B¥ì¤t¡B¦¶¤lªº²z®ð½×°µ¤ñ¸û¡Cµ§ªÌ¥H¬°¾ãµÚ²z®ð½×¤D±N¦¶¤lªº¤G¤¸½×Âà¦^©ú¹D¥ì¤tªº¤@¤¸½×¡F¦Ó¦b¤@¤¸½×¤¤¡A¥L¤@¤è±ªuŧ©ú¹Dµ½´c¬Ò¤Ñ²z¤§»¡¡A¤@¤è±¤S¹³¥ì¤t¯ë¥H²z¬°ÀR©w¦ÓµL©Ò¤£¦bªº³W½d¡C¦]¦¹¨ä²z½×¬O§é°J§ÎºAªº¡C
¡@
The
Theory of Principle and Material Force of Lo Ch'in-shun
Chung Tsai-chun
¡@¡@This article is a study of Lo Ch'in-shun's doctrine of
Principle and Material Force. Its main purpose is to clarify its ambiguity and to give it
a proper place in the history of Chinese philosophy.
¡@¡@In the history of Chinese philosophy Lo has been interpreted in
different and even contradictory ways. He was acknowledged as a representative of the Chu
Hsi school, but he held a monistic view of Principle and Material Force, which is
different from Chu's dualistic view. In recent decades scholars of Mainland China even
praised him as a materialist. My article points out that his doctrine is characterized by
eclecticism. On the one hand, he admitted the determinative nature of Material Force; on
the other, he insisted the eternity and universality of Principle. As a result, he
proposed the doctrine of "oneness of principle and differentiation of
particulars," which indicates that these two elements go side by side and are equally
important.
¡@¡@The author then compares Lo's doctrine with those of Ch'eng Hao,
Ch'eng I, and Chu Hsi. Lo's doctrine is a return from the dualism of Chu Hsi to the monism
of the Ch'eng brothers. As a monist, Lo accepted Ch'eng Hao's doctrine that both good and
evil are Heavenly Principle, while he is similar to Ch'eng I in thinking that Principle is
unmoved, omnipresent law of the world. From these characteristics it seems proper to call
his doctrine eclecticism.
Keywords:
Neo-Confucianism¡@¡@¡@ Lo Ch'in-shun¡@¡@¡@ Ch'eng
Hao
¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@Ch'eng I¡@¡@¡@ Chu Hsi
¡@
¡@
·í¥N¾§ªÌªº©s¤l¾Ç¸ÑÄÀ¤§¤ÀªR ¡Ð¥Hð§g¼Ý¡B®}´_Æ[¡B¦È©v¤T¬°¤¤¤ß
¶À «T ³Ç
´£¡@n
¡@¡@¥»¤å¤ÀªRð§g¼Ý¡B®}´_Æ[¡B¦È©v¤Tµ¥¤ý¦ì·í¥N¾§ªÌ¹ï©s¤l¾Çªº¸ÑÄÀ¡AÂç²M¨ä©ÒIJ[¤§«ä·Q¥v·N¸q¡C¥þ¤å½×z¦@¤À¤¸`¡G²Ä¤@¸`»¡©ú©s¤l¾Ç¬OÀ˵ø·í¥N¾§®a¾ÇªÌ¶¡²§¦P¤§·¥¨Î«ü¼Ð¡A¬G³q¹Lð¦È®}¤T¥ý¥Í¹ï©s¾Ç¤§¸ÑÄÀ¡A¥i¥H²¤¿s·í¥N¾§¾Ç«ä·Q¤§°Ê¦V¡C²Ä¤G¸`«h¹ïð¦È®}¤T¥ý¥Í«ä·Q»P¾Ç³N¤§¦P½Õ¤Î¨ä²§½ì¡A¥[¥H¤ñ¸ûªR½×¡C²Ä¤T¸`±´°Qð¦È®}¤T¥ý¥Í¹ï©s¤l¤ß©Ê½×©Ò´£¥X¤§¤£¦P¸ÑÄÀ¡A¨Ã»¡©ú©Ò¥HP¦¹¤§ì¥Ñ¡C²Ä¥|¸`«h¤ÀªR¤T¤ó¹ï©s¤l¬Fªv«ä·Q¤§¬Ýªk¤Î¨ä®t²§¡C²Ä¤¸`«h´Nð¦È®}¤T¥ý¥Íªº©s¤l¾Ç¸ÑÄÀ¤§Àu¦Hµuªø²¤¥[µûúp¤Þ¥Ó¡A¨Ã»¡©ú§Ú̱q·í¥N¾§®a¤§©s¾Ç¸ÑÄÀ¤¤©ÒÀò±o¤§±Ò¥Ü¡C
ÃöÁäµü :
©s¤l ¡@¡@ð§g¼Ý¡@¡@ ®}´_Æ[¡@¡@ ¦È©v¤T
¡@
Three Contemporary Interpretations of Mencius: T'ang Chün-i,
Hsu Fu-kuan, and Mou Tsung-san
Huang
Chün-chieh
¡@¡@This essay explains (in Section A) how the contemporary
trend of thought in China is best understood by understanding three representative
thinkers?views on the Chinese pivotal thinker, Mencius. After (in Section B) making
comparisons of their thrusts of thinking in general, the essay (in Section C) considers
their differing views on Mencius?theory of the heartmind, followed by (in Section D) a
consideration of their differing views on Mencius' political theory. Finally (in Section
E) a brief assessment is made on their strengths and our task ahead which they pointed out
via their weaknesses.
¡@
¡@
·s¤k©Ê¡Ð¡Ð
¤¥|°ü¤kªº¦Û§Ú¸Ñ©ñ
´^ ¤p §°
´£¡@n
¡@¡@¥Á°êªì¦~¡A¤¤°ê¤k©Ê·NÃѨì¦oÌÀ³¸Ó©M¨k¤H¤@¼Ë¡A¦¨¬°¿W¥ß¦Û¥Dªº¤H¡C¤k©Ê¶}©lª§¨ú¨ü±Ð¨|¡BÄ~©Ó°]²£©M±B«Ã¦Û¥Dªº¾÷·|¡C³\¦hÂø»x±M¨Æ³B²z°ü¤k°ÝÃD¡AµÛ¦W¾ÇªÌ©M¤@¯ëŪªÌ³£¯É¯É¬°¤å¡A°Q½×°ü¤k¿W¥ß¦Û¥Dªº¬ÛÃöijÃD¡C
¡@¡@¤¤°ê²{¥N¤k§@®a±U°_©ó³o¼Ëªº¤å¤ÆÀô¹Ò¤¤¡A¦ÛµMµo®i¥X¨¬¥H¤Ï¬M®É¥Nªº¼g§@¯S©Ê¡A¨Ò¦p°ü¤k¸Ñ©ñªº©IÆ~¡B¤k©Ê¦b©Ê°ÝÃD¤WªºÄ±¿ô¡B¹ï±Ð¨|ªº´÷±æ¡B¸gÀÙ¿W¥ßµ¥µ¥¡C¥»¤å±´°Q¤G¡B¤T¡³¦~¥N±U°_ªº¤ý¦ì¤k§@®a¦p¦óªí¹F³oºØ¤ßÁn¡C¥ÕÁ¨
(1894-198?)¡BÃfÁô (1899-1934)¡B¶¾¨J§g (1900-74)·í¬õ¤§®É¡A©M¦B¤ß¤Î¤B¬Â»ô¦W¡A¦ý¤é«á«o¬°ÅªªÌ©Ò¿ò§Ñ¡C¥b¥@¬ö«áªº¤µ¤Ñ¡A¦³¥²n«·sÀ˰Q³o¤T¦ì°ü¤k¹B°Êªº¥ý¾W¡C
¡@¡@¦o̩ҿï¾Üªº±Ô¨Æ¼Ò¦¡¡B©ÒÃöÃhªº¥DÃD©M¨Ï¥Îªº»y¨¥¡A¦b¦bÅã¥Ü¥X¦oÌ«æ±ýÂ\²æ¼Æ¦Ê¦~¨ÓÀ£¢¤k©ÊÁnµ©M¨Å骺§ô¿£¡Cµ§ªÌÁöµL·N¬°³o´X¦ì§@®a¼g¶Ç¡A«o±N±´°Q¦o̤H¥Í¾ú½m¤¤ªº¬Y¨ÇÃöÁä©Ê¥v®Æ¡F¦]¬°¦o̪º¤H¥Í¾ú½m¡A¦p¦P¦o̪º§@«~¡A¨¬¬°·í®Éª§¨ú¦Û¥DÅvªº¤k©Ê¤§¼g·Ó¡C
ÃöÁäµü¡G·s¤k©Ê¡@¡@ °ü¤k¦Û¥D¡@¡@ ¦Û§Ú¸Ñ©ñ¡@¡@
¸Ñ©ñ¡@¡@ °ü¤k¸Ñ©ñ¹B°Ê¡@¡@
¡@¡@¡@¡@±Ô¨Æ¼Ò¦¡
¡@
The New Woman:
May Fourth Women's
Struggle for Self-Liberation
Peng Hsiao-yen
¡@¡@During the early Republican years, Chinese women were
awakened to the fact that they ought to be independent human beings like men. They began
to fight for the chance of getting an education, for their right to inherit the family
property, and even for the right to decide their own marriages. Numerous magazines were
devoted to the woman issue, with eminent scholars as well as ordinary readers contributing
articles discussing a variety of problems concerning women's independence.
¡@¡@Emerging in such a cultural milieu, modern Chinese women writers
no doubt developed in their writings characteristics that reflected the imprint of their
times: the outcry for emancipation, female sexual awakening, the longing for
self-improvement, economic independence, and so on. In this paper I try to show how three
women writers in the twenties and thirties managed to voice all these desires in their
works: Bai Wai (1894-198?), Lu Yin (1899-1934), and Feng Yuanjun (1900-1974). At the peak
of their writing careers they aroused as much attention as Bing Xin and Ding Ling. Yet
somehow for some reason or other, they were forgotten with the lapse of time. After more
than half a century, it is time to "unearth" these three writers who were
among the pioneers of the women's liberation movement.
¡@¡@The narrative modes they chose to write in, the themes they were
concerned about, and the language they used manifest that they were eager to break the
bondage that suppressed women's voices as well as their bodies for centuries.
Although I by no means pretend to be their biographer, some facts in their lives will be
discussed, because their lives, like their writings, did exemplify a generation of women
who were fighting for self-liberation. |