Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, Academia Sinica ¡¼

¡U¤¤¥¡¬ã¨s°|¡U¤¤°ê¤å­õ¬ã¨s©Ò¡U¥»©Ò¦ì¸m¹Ï MAP ¡U©Ò¤º¤½§i¡U¤¤¤åª©¡UENGLISH¡U

¤¤°ê¤å­õ¬ã¨s¶°¥Z ²Ä¤»´Á

¥Ø ¿ý

¡@

Number 6  March 1995

An Examination of the Relation between Tso-chuan and Kuo-yü from the Viewpoint of Narrative Literature

John C.Y.Wang

The Formation of the Teaching of "Nature Origination"   in Hua-yen Buddhism

Liu Ming-wood
The Significance of Yun-Lu Analysis in Studies of Song Ci Lin Mei-yi
The Scope of the Imperial Power and the Autonomy of the Intellectuals in the Early Ming: Reflections on the Meng-tzu chieh-wen Chu Ron-guey
The Theory of Principle and Material Force of Lo Ch'in-shun Chung Tsai-chun

Three Contemporary Interpretations of Mencius: T'ang Chün-i, Hsü Fu-kuan, and Mou Tsung-san

Huang Chun-chieh
The New Woman: May Fourth Women's Struggle for Self-Liberation Peng Hsiao-yen

¡@

¡@

±q±Ô¨Æ¤å¾Ç¨¤«×¬Ý¡m¥ª¶Ç¡n¡m°ê»y¡nªºÃö«Y

¤ý ¹t ¦t

´£¡@­n

¡@¡@¡m¥ª¶Ç¡n»P¡m°ê»y¡n¤G®Ñ¤§¶¡ªºÃö«Y¡A¾ú¨Ó¾ÇªÌ°Q½×ªº«Ü¦h¡A¦ý¦h¥Ñ¤º®e¡B¤å¦r¡B¤åªk¡B»y·Jµ¥¤è­±¤J¤â¡C¥»¤å«h¹Á¸Õ±q±Ô¨Æ¤å¾Ç¨¤«×¡A¹ï¦¹¤@½ÒÃD§@¶i¤@¨B¤§±´°Q¡A¨Ã¥H¤G®Ñ©Ò¸üªº¡u¥Ó¥Í¤§¦º¡v¨Æ¥ó¬°¹ê¨Ò¡A­«¥[¤ÀªR¡Cµ²ªG©M¤j¦h¼Æ¾ÇªÌªº¬Ýªk¤@­P¡A§Y¤G®Ñ¬J«D¥Ñ¤@®Ñ¤Æ¤À¦Ó¦¨¡A¥ç«D¥Ñ¤@¤H©Ò§@¡C¾¨ºÞ¦p¦¹¡A¤G®Ñ¶¡ÅãµM¤]¦s¦bµÛ«D¤ñ´M±`ªº±K¤ÁÃö«Y¡C´N¥Ó¥Í¨Æ¥ó¨Ó¬Ý¡A¤£¦ý¤G®Ñ©Ò±Ô²Ó¸`¦h©Ò¹p¦P¡A¦³®É¬Æ¦Ü³s±¹Ãã¤]§¹¥þ¤@¼Ë¡C¦b©|µLªkÃÒ¹ê¤G®Ñ©Ò¨ú®Æ¬Û¦P¤§«e¡A¦Ó¡m°ê»y¡n½s¼gªÌ´¿±Ä¥Î¹L¡m¥ª¶Ç¡nªº¥i¯à©Ê¤S·L¥G¨ä·L¡A¡m¥ª¶Ç¡n§@ªÌ´¿°Ñ¦Ò¨Ã±Ä¥Î¹L¡m°ê»y¡nªº¥i¯à©ÊÀ³¥i¦s¦b¡C

¡@

An Examination of the Relation between Tso-chuan and Kuo-yu from the Viewpoint of Narrative Literature

John C.Y.Wang

¡@¡@The issue of the textual relation between Tso-chuan and Kuo-yu has been extensively discussed by scholars. Most of them¡Ahowever¡Ahave written in terms of content, language, grammar, and vocabulary. The present study is an attempt to reexamine the issue from the point of view of narrative literature, using the narrative of Shen-sheng as an actual example. The result of this new study tallies well with the prevailing view among academic circles: the two books were not off-shoots of one common larger work; nor were they written by one common author. The fact remains, however, that the two books seem to bear an unusually close relationship with each other. In the narrative of Shen-sheng, for example, not only many of the details narrated are similar, but there is an uncanny resemblance in wording in places as well. Three possible explanations for this intriguing phenomenon maybe advanced: that the two authors involved used the same original materials, that the author of Tso-chuan had consulted kuo-yu, and vice versa. Given the evidence available now, the second explanation would seem to be the most plausible of the three.

Keywords: Tso-chuan Kuo-yunarrative literature

¡@

¡@

µØÄY©v©Ê°_«ä·Qªº§Î¦¨

¹ù ©ú ¬¡

´£¡@­n

¡@¡@¡u©Ê°_¡vÆ[©À¦bµØÄY±Ð¾Ç¸Ì¦û¦³­«­n¦ì¸m¡A¥v®a¨C§â¥¦¸ò¤Ñ»O©vªº¡u©Ê¨ã¡vÆ[©À¹ïÁ|¡Aµø¤§¬°µØÄY©v«ä·Qªº¥D­n¼ÐÃÑ¡C¥»¤å¹ï©Ê°_Æ[©Àªº¨Ó·½¤Î¨ä¦b¦­´ÁµØÄY©v±Ð¾Ç¸Ìªº·N¸q§@¥X¤ÀªR¡C¡u©Ê°_¡vÆ[©À·½¥X¤»¤Q¨÷¥»¡mµØÄY¸g¡n¤§¡q¦p¨Ó©Ê°_«~¡r¡A¦Ó¦¹«~©Ò¿×¡u©Ê°_¡v¡A°ò¥»¤W¬O«ü¦p¨Ó©ÒÅã²{ªº¦UºØ©Ê¬Û¡C¤S¦¹«~¤À­z¦p¨Ó©ÒÅã²{½Ñ©Ê¬Û¡A¦b»¡©ú¦p¨Óªº´¼¼z©Ê©Mı©Ê¬°µL©Ò¤£¤Î®É¡A´£¥X¤@¤Á²³¥Í±x¨ã¦p¨Óªº´¼¼z©Ê©Mı©Êªº»¡ªk¡C³o»¡ªk¦bµØÄY©v±Ð¾Çªº©l³ÐªÌ´¼Åk¡]602-668¡^ªºµÛ§@¸Ì¡A±o¨ì¶}®i¡A¦¨¬°´¼Åkªº©Ê°_«ä·Qªº¥D²´¡C¤S´¼Åk¬É©w¤F¡u©Ê°_¡v¤@Ã㪺²[¸q¡A¹ï¡u©Ê°_¡v¸ò¡u½t°_¡vªºÃö«Y¡B¡u©Ê°_¡v¸ò¡u½t­×¡vªº¤À§Oµ¥°ÝÃD¡A³£¦³²M·¡»¡©ú¡A³þ©w¤FµØÄY©v©Ê°_«ä·Qªº°ò¦¡C´¼Åkªº§Ì¤lªkÂá]643-713¡^¬°µØÄY©v±Ð¾ÇÅé¨tªº«Ø¥ßªÌ¡CªkÂð£¤F¹³´¼Åk¯ë¦Û²³¥Í¦]¦aªº¼h­±Á¿©Ê°_¥~¡A¦P®É¥ç±q¦p¨ÓªG¦aªº¼h­±³¯­z©Ê°_¡C§ó­È±oª`·NªÌ¡A¬OªkÂçâ©Ê°_Æ[©À¸òµØÄY±Ð¾Çªº¤@§Y¤@¤Á¡B¬Û¿ÄµLꪺ¦t©zÆ[³sµ²¡A±q¦Ó¬ð¥X¤F©Ê°_Æ[©À¦bµØÄY«ä·Q¾ãÅ骺·N¸q¡C

¡@

The Formation of the Teaching of "Nature Origination" in Hua-yen Buddhism

Liu Ming-wood

¡@¡@The teaching of "nature origination" (hsing-ch'i©Ê°_) is generally regarded as an important component of Hua-yen thought, and this paper examines its origin and early history. The term "nature origination" is derived from the title of chapter 30 of the 6O chuan version of the Avatamsaka Sutra, where it is used to refer to the manifestation of the characteristics of the Buddha. On depicting the Buddha's characteristics of wisdom and enlightenment, the Sutra speaks about their presence in every sentient being; and this thought of the omnipresence of the Buddha's nature of enlightenment underlies the teaching of nature-origination of Chih-yen ´¼Åk (602-668) and Fa-tsang ªkÂà (643-713), the founders of the Hua-yen School µØÄY©v. Both Chih-yen and Fa-tsang use ideas denoting man's inherent essence of enlightenment, such as "Buddha-nature" and "tathagatagarbha" to explain the meaning of "nature origination". Both contrast the teaching of "nature origination" with the teachings of "dependent origination" (yuan-ch'i½t°_) and "conditioned practice" (yuan-hsiu½t­×), with an eye to highlighting the notion of inherent enlightenment. Different from Chih-yen's exposition of "nature origination" which focuses on the aspect of cause, Fa-tsang’s interpretation of "Nature origination" comphasizes the aspect of fruit. Fa-tsang further eonneets the teaching of "Nature origination"with the Hua-yen teaching of universal harmony, presenting the former as the theoretical basis of the latter.

Keywords: Buddha-nature¡@¡@¡@ Chih-yen

¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@conditioned practice¡@¡@¡@ dependent origination

¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@essence of enlightenment¡@¡@¡@ Fa-tsang ¡@¡@¡@Hua-yen School

¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@nature-origination¡@¡@¡@ tathagatagarbha

¡@

¡@

Ãý«ß¤ÀªR¦b§ºµü¬ã¨s¤W

¤§·N¸q

ªL ª´ »ö

´£¡@­n

¡@¡@¥jÄy¹q¸£¤ÆÁö¬O¥²µM¤§ÁͶաA¦ý¤@¯ë¥u¬O´£¨Ñ¥þ¤åÀ˯Á¡A¥Hµü¾Ç¤è­±»¡¡A¥u¯à´N§@ªÌ¡BµüµP¡B¦r¼Æ¡Bµü·J¡B­¶½X¤Îµü§@¥¿¤å¬d¸ß¡A­Õ­Y­n¬d¸ß¡m¥þ§ºµü¡n¤¤¡A¦³¦h¤ÖÅ馡¬°¡mµüÃСn¡B¡mµü«ß¡n©Ò¥¢¦¬¡H§ºµü¤¤¨s¦³¦h¤Ö¤£¦P¤§¨óÃý¤è¦¡¡H¤G®a¤¬¨£¤§µü§@¨s¦³¦h¤Ö¡H¤D¦Ü¦b¥ô¤@§@®a¤§µü§@¤¤¡A¬Y¦r´¿¥Î»P¦ó¦r¨óÃýµ¥¡A«hµLªk´£¨Ñ¡C¬O¬Gµ§ªÌ°w¹ï¥þ¤åÀ˯Á¤§ª¼ÂI¡A¥t¦æ³]­p¡u¥þ§ºµü¡vÀ˯Á¨t²Î¡C±N­ð¦c¼ý¡m¥þ§ºµü¡n¤Î¤Õ¤Z§¡m¥þ§ºµü¸É¿è¡n¤G®Ñ©Ò¦¬¡A¦@¤G¸U¤@¤d¤T¦Ê¤E¤Q­ºµü¡]§t¦s¥Ø¡^¤§§@ªÌ¡BµüµP¡B¦r¼Æ¡B½Õ¦¡¡BÃý¦rµ¥¿é¤J¹q¸£¡A°£¨ÑÂk¯Ç¤Î¹ï¦¹¥~¡A©|¥i¨ÌÃýªk±N¦r§@¨tÁp¡A§@¬°µüÃý¬ã¨s¤§­«­n¸ê®Æ¡C

¡@¡@¥»¤å¦®¦b»¡©ú«Ø¥ß¦¹¸ê®Æ®w¤§¤èªk¥H¤Î¨ä¦bµü¾Ç¬ã¨s¤W»ù­È¡A¤À¬°¨â¤j³¡¤À¡G

¡@¡@¤@¡B»¡©ú¦b«Ø¥ßÃýÃÐÀ˨t²Î®ÉÁ{¤§§xÃø¡A¥D­n¦³¥|ÂI¡G

¡@¡@¡@1.ª©¥»¤£¦P©Ò§Î¦¨¤§§xÂZ¡A

¡@¡@¡@2.¯}ªk¦³»~¦Ó³y¦¨¤§®t²§¡A

¡@¡@¡@3.¤À¤ù¤£¦P¦Ó³y¦¨¤§§xÂZ¡A

¡@¡@¡@4.¨óÃý»P§_©Ò¾É­P¤§§xÃø¡C

¡@¡@¤G¡B»¡©úÃý«ß¤ÀªR¹ïµü¾Ç¬ã¨s´£¨Ñ¤§°^Äm¡A¥D­n¦³¤CÂI¡G

¡@¡@¡@1.­q¸É¬J¦³¤§µü½Õ¤ÎÅ馡¡A

¡@¡@¡@2.¿ë»{­ì¤w¥¢¥h¤§µü½Õ¦W¡A

¡@¡@¡@3.¦³§U©óµü§x´b¤§¸Ñ¨M¡A

¡@¡@¡@4.¥i®Õ¹ï­«½g¤Î©MÃý¤§§@¡A

¡@¡@¡@5.¦³§U©ó¨óÃý¤è¦¡¤§¤F¸Ñ¡A

¡@¡@¡@6.¥iÂç²M½Õ¦W¦P²§¤§§xÂZ¡A

¡@¡@¡@7.¦³§U©óÃý³¡¤À¦X¤§¬ã¨s¡C

¡@

The Significance of Yun-Lu Analysis in

Studies of Song Ci

Lin Mei-yi

¡@¡@Although the computerization of classical texts has become inevitable, its use is still limited to on-line index search. In terms of ci studies, it only offers help to inquiries such as authors, tune titles, numbers of characters, vocabularies, frequencies of certain words, page numbers, and texts. However, computerization has offered little help to questions such as how many modes in Quansongci are not included in Cipu and Cilu? how many rhyming patterns are there in Song ci? how many ci works are attributed to more than one author? and in works of a certain author, what characters rhyme with a certain character? Aiming to eliminate the blind spots of on-line index search, I have established a new system of Quansongci index search. I have therefore keyed in the 21, 390 ci works in Tang Guizhang's Quansongci and kong Fanli's Quansongci buji, including their authors, tune titles, numbers of characters, patterns, and rhymed characters. The new system can be used not only for compare and contrast, but for associating rhymed characters according to rhyming patterns.

¡@¡@This essay attempts to demonstrate the methodology used to establish this new index system as well as the value of it in ci studies. It is divided into two parts:

¡@¡@1.It explains the difficulties in establishing the yunpu index system. There are fur problems: (l) there are multiple editions; (2) there are variations caused by mistakes of pofa; (3) there are cases of confusion caused by variations of fenpian; (4) there are ambiguities caused by the existence or non-existence of rhyming.

¡@¡@2.It explicates the value of yun-lu analysis in ci studies. It makes seven major contributions: (l) it supplements the musical modes and styles known to us; (2) it traces the names of musical modes that have been lost; (3) it clarifies cases of confusion in ci studies; (4) it offers access to repetitions and matching works; works; (5) it enables us to understand rhyming patterns; (6) it helps to solve the problem of names of modes; (7) it benefits the study of yunbu.

Keywords: Cilu ¡@¡@¡@Cipu¡@¡@¡@ Quansongci ¡@¡@¡@Quansongci buji

¡@¡@¡@¡@Songci ¡@¡@¡@Ciyun¡@¡@¡@ meter¡@¡@¡@ cilu¡@¡@¡@ cipu

¡@¡@¡@¡@cipai (tune title)¡@¡@¡@ cidiao(musical mode)¡@¡@¡@

¡@¡@¡@¡@diaoshi (pattern)¡@¡@¡@ fenpian¡@¡@¡@ pofa¡@¡@¡@

¡@¡@¡@¡@index of the on-line search¡@¡@¡@ Wan Shu¡@¡@¡@

¡@¡@¡@¡@Tang Guizhang Kong Fanli

¡@

¡@

±q¼B¤T§^¡m©s¤l¸`¤å¡n½×§gÅvªº­­¨î»Pª¾ÃÑ¥÷¤l¤§

¦Û¥D©Ê

¦¶ ºa ¶Q

´£¡@­n

¡@¡@©ú¤Ó¯ª©R¥O¼B¤ý§^(1313-1399)§R¡m©s¤l¡n¤¤¤£«K©ó¥L±M¨î²Îªv¤§³B¦Ó§@¦¨¡m©s¤l¸`¤å¡n¡C¥»¤å¥Ñ¡m©s¤l¸`¤å¡n¨Ó°Q½×¾§®aªº¸g¨å¬O§_¨ã¦³¯«¸t»P§¹¾ã©Ê¡A¨¬¥H¤@¤è­±¨Ï§gÅv¥¿·í¤Æ¡A¦P®É¥ç¥i²o¨î§gÅvµL­­¨îªºÂX®i¡A§¹¦¨ª¾ÃÑ¥÷¤l¤§¦Û¥D©Ê¡C

¡@¡@±q¡m©s¤l¸`¤å¡nªº½s¼¶¹Lµ{¤¤¡A§Ú­Ì¥i¥H¬Ý¥X§Y¨Ï¦b¬ÓÅv·¥«×°ªº¦ªº±¡ªp¤U¡A¦b®£©Æ¬FªvÀ±º©ªÀ·|ªº§x¹Ò¤¤¡A¾§ªÌ¤´Â¾֦³¬Û·í¤jªº¸ê·½¤Î«Ü°ªªº¦a¦ì¨Ó¤Ï§Ü¼É¬FªºÀ£­¢¡C¸g¨åªº¶Ç²Î¤Î§¨îªºÅv«Â³£¦b¬ÓÅv¤§¤W¡A¥i¥H§@¬°¤ä«ù¾§ªÌ§Üª§ªº¹D¼w©Ê¤Î¬Fªv©Ê¤§¨Ì¾Ú¡C¦b²z½×¤W¡A¾§®a¶Ç²Î¬O«Ò¨î¦Xªk©Êªº¨Ì¾Ú¡C©Ò¥H¬Ó«ÒµLªk¥þ­±ªº¡B¥¿­±ªº¤Ï§Ü¾§®a¶Ç²Î¡A³y¦¨¦Û¤v²ÎªvÅv¤Oªº°Ê·n¡C¦P®É¬Ó«Ò¨Ã¨S¦³¾Ö¦³¸àÄÀ¾§¾Çªº°ß¤@ªºÅv¤O¡A©Ò¥H¾§ªÌ´N¨ã¦³§åµû¡B¤Ï§Ü¡u©x¤è¡v«ä·Qªº¤O¶q»P¨­¥÷¡C¦ý¬O¾§ªÌªº¦Û¥D©Ê©Î§Üª§Åv¤O±q¨Ó¨S¦³³Q¨î«×¤Æ¡A¦]¦¹¨S¦³¦b¾ú¥v¤W¥R¤Àµo´§¥¦ªºÂ¾Åv¤Î¼ç¤O¡C

¡@

The Scope of the Imperial Power and the Autonomy of the Intellectuals in the Early Ming: Reflections on the Meng-tzu chieh-wen

Chu Ron-guey

¡@¡@The autocratic emperor Ming T'ai-tsu ordered his minister Liu San-wu (l313-1399) to purge those passages in the Mencius that are not beneficial to his authoritarian rule. The result was a expurgated version of the classic, which was decreed as the standard for the civil service examination. This article discusses the contents of the expurgated text and its implications regarding the dynamic tension between the emperor and the Confucian intellectuals.

Keywords: Meng Tzu ¡@¡@¡@Ming T'ai-tsu

¡@

¡@

ù¾ã©aªº²z®ð½×

Áé ±m ¶v

´£¡@­n

¡@¡@ù¾ãµÚ¬O©ú¥Nµ{¦¶¾Ç¬£ªº­«­n¥Nªí¡A«o¥H¡u²z®ð¬°¤@¡v ¤§»¡µÛºÙ¡Aªñ´X¤Q¦~§ó¬°¤¤°ê¤j³°¾Ç¬É²±±À¬°¡u°ßª«¥D¸q¡v¡C¥»¤å¥Øªº¦b¤ÀªR¾ãµÚ²z®ð½×ªº¤º²[¡A¥H¨D±o¥¿½Tªº©w¦ì¡C

¡@¡@µ§ªÌ¥H¬°¾ãµÚªº²z®ð½×¦³¹L´çªº¡B§é°Jªº©Ê®æ¡A¥L¤@¤è­±©Ó»{®ðªº¨M©w©Ê®æ¡A¤@¤è­±¤S°í«ù²zªº«í©w»PµL©Ò¤£¦b¡Aµ²ªG³y¦¨¡u²z®ð´ý¤@¡B²z¤@¤À®í¡vªº¾Ç»¡¡A¦P®É­ÝÅU²z»P®ðªº­«­n©Ê¡C

¡@¡@¬°¤F§Ë²M¾ãµÚ²z®ð½×ªº§ÎºA¡Aµ§ªÌ¤S¨ú©ú¹D¡B¥ì¤t¡B¦¶¤lªº²z®ð½×°µ¤ñ¸û¡Cµ§ªÌ¥H¬°¾ãµÚ²z®ð½×¤D±N¦¶¤lªº¤G¤¸½×Âà¦^©ú¹D¥ì¤tªº¤@¤¸½×¡F¦Ó¦b¤@¤¸½×¤¤¡A¥L¤@¤è­±ªuŧ©ú¹Dµ½´c¬Ò¤Ñ²z¤§»¡¡A¤@¤è­±¤S¹³¥ì¤t¯ë¥H²z¬°ÀR©w¦ÓµL©Ò¤£¦bªº³W½d¡C¦]¦¹¨ä²z½×¬O§é°J§ÎºAªº¡C

¡@

The Theory of Principle and Material Force of Lo Ch'in-shun

Chung Tsai-chun

¡@¡@This article is a study of Lo Ch'in-shun's doctrine of Principle and Material Force. Its main purpose is to clarify its ambiguity and to give it a proper place in the history of Chinese philosophy.

¡@¡@In the history of Chinese philosophy Lo has been interpreted in different and even contradictory ways. He was acknowledged as a representative of the Chu Hsi school, but he held a monistic view of Principle and Material Force, which is different from Chu's dualistic view. In recent decades scholars of Mainland China even praised him as a materialist. My article points out that his doctrine is characterized by eclecticism. On the one hand, he admitted the determinative nature of Material Force; on the other, he insisted the eternity and universality of Principle. As a result, he proposed the doctrine of "oneness of principle and differentiation of particulars," which indicates that these two elements go side by side and are equally important.

¡@¡@The author then compares Lo's doctrine with those of Ch'eng Hao, Ch'eng I, and Chu Hsi. Lo's doctrine is a return from the dualism of Chu Hsi to the monism of the Ch'eng brothers. As a monist, Lo accepted Ch'eng Hao's doctrine that both good and evil are Heavenly Principle, while he is similar to Ch'eng I in thinking that Principle is unmoved, omnipresent law of the world. From these characteristics it seems proper to call his doctrine eclecticism.

Keywords: Neo-Confucianism¡@¡@¡@ Lo Ch'in-shun¡@¡@¡@ Ch'eng Hao

¡@¡@¡@¡@¡@Ch'eng I¡@¡@¡@ Chu Hsi

¡@

¡@

·í¥N¾§ªÌªº©s¤l¾Ç¸ÑÄÀ¤§¤ÀªR¡Ð¥H­ð§g¼Ý¡B®}´_Æ[¡B¦È©v¤T¬°¤¤¤ß

¶À «T ³Ç

´£¡@­n

¡@¡@¥»¤å¤ÀªR­ð§g¼Ý¡B®}´_Æ[¡B¦È©v¤Tµ¥¤ý¦ì·í¥N¾§ªÌ¹ï©s¤l¾Çªº¸ÑÄÀ¡AÂç²M¨ä©ÒÄ­²[¤§«ä·Q¥v·N¸q¡C¥þ¤å½×­z¦@¤À¤­¸`¡G²Ä¤@¸`»¡©ú©s¤l¾Ç¬OÀ˵ø·í¥N¾§®a¾ÇªÌ¶¡²§¦P¤§·¥¨Î«ü¼Ð¡A¬G³q¹L­ð¦È®}¤T¥ý¥Í¹ï©s¾Ç¤§¸ÑÄÀ¡A¥i¥H²¤¿s·í¥N¾§¾Ç«ä·Q¤§°Ê¦V¡C²Ä¤G¸`«h¹ï­ð¦È®}¤T¥ý¥Í«ä·Q»P¾Ç³N¤§¦P½Õ¤Î¨ä²§½ì¡A¥[¥H¤ñ¸ûªR½×¡C²Ä¤T¸`±´°Q­ð¦È®}¤T¥ý¥Í¹ï©s¤l¤ß©Ê½×©Ò´£¥X¤§¤£¦P¸ÑÄÀ¡A¨Ã»¡©ú©Ò¥H­P¦¹¤§­ì¥Ñ¡C²Ä¥|¸`«h¤ÀªR¤T¤ó¹ï©s¤l¬Fªv«ä·Q¤§¬Ýªk¤Î¨ä®t²§¡C²Ä¤­¸`«h´N­ð¦È®}¤T¥ý¥Íªº©s¤l¾Ç¸ÑÄÀ¤§Àu¦Hµuªø²¤¥[µûúp¤Þ¥Ó¡A¨Ã»¡©ú§Ú­Ì±q·í¥N¾§®a¤§©s¾Ç¸ÑÄÀ¤¤©ÒÀò±o¤§±Ò¥Ü¡C

ÃöÁäµü : ©s¤l ¡@¡@­ð§g¼Ý¡@¡@ ®}´_Æ[¡@¡@ ¦È©v¤T

¡@

Three Contemporary Interpretations of Mencius: T'ang Chün-i, Hsu Fu-kuan, and Mou Tsung-san

Huang Chün-chieh

¡@¡@This essay explains (in Section A) how the contemporary trend of thought in China is best understood by understanding three representative thinkers?views on the Chinese pivotal thinker, Mencius. After (in Section B) making comparisons of their thrusts of thinking in general, the essay (in Section C) considers their differing views on Mencius?theory of the heartmind, followed by (in Section D) a consideration of their differing views on Mencius' political theory. Finally (in Section E) a brief assessment is made on their strengths and our task ahead which they pointed out via their weaknesses.

¡@

¡@

·s¤k©Ê¡Ð¡Ð

¤­¥|°ü¤kªº¦Û§Ú¸Ñ©ñ

´^ ¤p §°

´£¡@­n

¡@¡@¥Á°êªì¦~¡A¤¤°ê¤k©Ê·NÃѨì¦o­ÌÀ³¸Ó©M¨k¤H¤@¼Ë¡A¦¨¬°¿W¥ß¦Û¥Dªº¤H¡C¤k©Ê¶}©lª§¨ú¨ü±Ð¨|¡BÄ~©Ó°]²£©M±B«Ã¦Û¥Dªº¾÷·|¡C³\¦hÂø»x±M¨Æ³B²z°ü¤k°ÝÃD¡AµÛ¦W¾ÇªÌ©M¤@¯ëŪªÌ³£¯É¯É¬°¤å¡A°Q½×°ü¤k¿W¥ß¦Û¥Dªº¬ÛÃöijÃD¡C

¡@¡@¤¤°ê²{¥N¤k§@®a±U°_©ó³o¼Ëªº¤å¤ÆÀô¹Ò¤¤¡A¦ÛµMµo®i¥X¨¬¥H¤Ï¬M®É¥Nªº¼g§@¯S©Ê¡A¨Ò¦p°ü¤k¸Ñ©ñªº©IÆ~¡B¤k©Ê¦b©Ê°ÝÃD¤WªºÄ±¿ô¡B¹ï±Ð¨|ªº´÷±æ¡B¸gÀÙ¿W¥ßµ¥µ¥¡C¥»¤å±´°Q¤G¡B¤T¡³¦~¥N±U°_ªº¤ý¦ì¤k§@®a¦p¦óªí¹F³oºØ¤ßÁn¡C¥ÕÁ¨ (1894-198?)¡BÃfÁô (1899-1934)¡B¶¾¨J§g (1900-74)·í¬õ¤§®É¡A©M¦B¤ß¤Î¤B¬Â»ô¦W¡A¦ý¤é«á«o¬°ÅªªÌ©Ò¿ò§Ñ¡C¥b¥@¬ö«áªº¤µ¤Ñ¡A¦³¥²­n­«·sÀ˰Q³o¤T¦ì°ü¤k¹B°Êªº¥ý¾W¡C

¡@¡@¦o­Ì©Ò¿ï¾Üªº±Ô¨Æ¼Ò¦¡¡B©ÒÃöÃhªº¥DÃD©M¨Ï¥Îªº»y¨¥¡A¦b¦bÅã¥Ü¥X¦o­Ì«æ±ýÂ\²æ¼Æ¦Ê¦~¨ÓÀ£­¢¤k©ÊÁn­µ©M¨­Å骺§ô¿£¡Cµ§ªÌÁöµL·N¬°³o´X¦ì§@®a¼g¶Ç¡A«o±N±´°Q¦o­Ì¤H¥Í¾ú½m¤¤ªº¬Y¨ÇÃöÁä©Ê¥v®Æ¡F¦]¬°¦o­Ìªº¤H¥Í¾ú½m¡A¦p¦P¦o­Ìªº§@«~¡A¨¬¬°·í®Éª§¨ú¦Û¥DÅvªº¤k©Ê¤§¼g·Ó¡C

ÃöÁäµü¡G·s¤k©Ê¡@¡@ °ü¤k¦Û¥D¡@¡@ ¦Û§Ú¸Ñ©ñ¡@¡@ ¸Ñ©ñ¡@¡@ °ü¤k¸Ñ©ñ¹B°Ê¡@¡@

¡@¡@¡@¡@±Ô¨Æ¼Ò¦¡

¡@

The New Woman:

May Fourth Women's Struggle for Self-Liberation

Peng Hsiao-yen

¡@¡@During the early Republican years, Chinese women were awakened to the fact that they ought to be independent human beings like men. They began to fight for the chance of getting an education, for their right to inherit the family property, and even for the right to decide their own marriages. Numerous magazines were devoted to the woman issue, with eminent scholars as well as ordinary readers contributing articles discussing a variety of problems concerning women's independence.

¡@¡@Emerging in such a cultural milieu, modern Chinese women writers no doubt developed in their writings characteristics that reflected the imprint of their times: the outcry for emancipation, female sexual awakening, the longing for self-improvement, economic independence, and so on. In this paper I try to show how three women writers in the twenties and thirties managed to voice all these desires in their works: Bai Wai (1894-198?), Lu Yin (1899-1934), and Feng Yuanjun (1900-1974). At the peak of their writing careers they aroused as much attention as Bing Xin and Ding Ling. Yet somehow for some reason or other, they were forgotten with the lapse of time. After more than half a century, it is time to "unearth"  these three writers who were among the pioneers of the women's  liberation movement.

¡@¡@The narrative modes they chose to write in, the themes they were concerned about, and the language they used manifest that they were eager to break the bondage that suppressed women's  voices as well as their bodies for centuries. Although I by no means pretend to be their biographer, some facts in their lives will be discussed, because their lives, like their writings, did exemplify a generation of women who were fighting for self-liberation.